Logo by Fiery - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Visit the official fractalforums.com Youtube Channel
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. April 16, 2024, 02:14:57 PM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: DEcombinate suggestion  (Read 2393 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
blob
Strange Attractor
***
Posts: 272



« on: April 03, 2011, 07:28:28 PM »

Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible to implement another DEcombinate option, namely the opposite of max mode which would show only the parts that are not common to both formulas?

 afro
Logged
Jesse
Download Section
Fractal Schemer
*
Posts: 1013


« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2011, 08:01:55 PM »

Does anybody is reading the description?  wink

===========
FORMULA TAB
===========
...
  "DEcombinate" hybrid:
     Here you can combine two formulas, in the "min" option (shown in the first
     formula tab) the formulas are both complete, "max" excludes both formulas,
     meaning that the combined object is only where both formulas were present.
     The "avg" option is maybe not very useful, it averages both DE's in a
     logarithmic way, what is near to the "min" option.
     The first formula represents one of the two combinated formulas, so you
     can't use an alternating hybrid for it.  The second formula is defined by
     formula 2 to 6, that represents an alternating hybrid.
Logged
blob
Strange Attractor
***
Posts: 272



« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2011, 01:40:20 AM »

Sorry for late answer Jesse, I didn't noticed you had replied.  grin

I think I have read (and experimented with simple shapes) correctly.

In Min mode we see both objects/formulas entirely.

In Max mode we see only the parts that are common to the two objects/formulas.

And what I was suggesting is the opposite of Max (or Min minus Max) where we could see only the parts that are not common to the objects and whose interest may lie in getting a view from a hollow inside.

Does this make sense or am I just not getting it?

 afro

Logged
Jesse
Download Section
Fractal Schemer
*
Posts: 1013


« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2011, 11:32:29 PM »

Ah yes, this is not possible because you would have to render inside both formulas where you don't have a DE for raystepping...
Logged
blob
Strange Attractor
***
Posts: 272



« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2011, 01:37:24 PM »

Too bad  undecided
Logged
blob
Strange Attractor
***
Posts: 272



« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2012, 09:50:05 PM »

Ah yes, this is not possible because you would have to render inside both formulas where you don't have a DE for raystepping...

Would you consider adding this DECombinate option Jesse since we now can render the inside as well?
Logged
Jesse
Download Section
Fractal Schemer
*
Posts: 1013


« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2012, 06:21:46 PM »

The new "Ia" (invert max) method is not exactly what you proposed, but you can hollow one bulb with the first formulas bulb.
But to look really inside, the inside rendering is much better because with above function you see only the first bulbs surface from the inside. 
Logged
blob
Strange Attractor
***
Posts: 272



« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2012, 10:58:56 PM »

The new "Ia" (invert max) method is not exactly what you proposed, but you can hollow one bulb with the first formulas bulb.
But to look really inside, the inside rendering is much better because with above function you see only the first bulbs surface from the inside. 

OK thanks, I'll see what I can do with that La mode.

Cheers.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Decombinate 4 Mandelbulb3D Gallery tomot 0 868 Last post April 12, 2011, 12:11:42 AM
by tomot
nice DEcombinate Movies Showcase (Rate My Movie) slon_ru 0 849 Last post September 09, 2011, 04:00:34 PM
by slon_ru
IFS, KIFS, DIFS, RIFS, LRIFS. How does DEcombinate fit in? General Discussion valera_rozuvan 4 2037 Last post August 03, 2016, 08:58:49 PM
by valera_rozuvan
DEcombinate not working on mac bug reporting Eldflaug 5 1862 Last post May 03, 2017, 08:22:56 PM
by Eldflaug
Some formula suggestion Kalles Fraktaler Alef 3 3039 Last post September 23, 2017, 10:45:38 PM
by Kalles Fraktaler

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.155 seconds with 25 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.008s, 2q)