Logo by mauxuam - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Did you know ? you can use LaTex inside Postings on fractalforums.com!
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. April 25, 2024, 10:53:25 AM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: CHAOS VS BLACK SWAN THEORY'S  (Read 4354 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Bent-Winged Angel
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 561



« on: November 23, 2010, 10:28:19 PM »

Ok I just started to read Gleick's book "Chaos"  Then I stumbled into the book by Taleb "Black Swan Theory"  Now I was pondering.. are they not saying virtually the same thing?
Logged

Jameses
Guest
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2010, 01:01:48 AM »

care to summarize?
Logged
fractower
Iterator
*
Posts: 173


« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2010, 06:49:51 AM »

I think it is fair to say that both theories place bounds on the ability to predict the future, but I think for different reasons.

In a chaotic system, small errors in initial conditions (or introduced noise) are preserved and amplified. At some point the amplification is such that all predictive ability is lost.

In  Black Swan Theory the prediction problem is not so much with initial conditions. The problem is that some smart ass comes along and changes the rules.
Logged
Bent-Winged Angel
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 561



« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2010, 03:45:55 PM »

care to summarize?
 Here is a quick summery! 
I think it is fair to say that both theories place bounds on the ability to predict the future, but I think for different reasons.

In a chaotic system, small errors in initial conditions (or introduced noise) are preserved and amplified. At some point the amplification is such that all predictive ability is lost.

In  Black Swan Theory the prediction problem is not so much with initial conditions. The problem is that some smart ass comes along and changes the rules.
In black swan theory it seems to mainly deal with man made occurances.  Chaos theory seems to deal with (my God) Mother nature.


<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/BDbuJtAiABA&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/BDbuJtAiABA&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1</a>
Soo new question..Which is more unpredictable.. man or nature?
Logged

lkmitch
Fractal Lover
**
Posts: 238



« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2010, 05:10:30 PM »


Soo new question..Which is more unpredictable.. man or nature?
[/quote]

Yes.   smiley  The rules of man are far less well codified than those of nature.  On the other hand, people are probably much better at navigating ill-defined people-based systems than nature-based systems, so it may be a wash.
Logged
Bent-Winged Angel
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 561



« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2010, 04:10:02 PM »


Soo new question..Which is more unpredictable.. man or nature?

Yes.   smiley  The rules of man are far less well codified than those of nature.  On the other hand, people are probably much better at navigating ill-defined people-based systems than nature-based systems, so it may be a wash.
[/quote]

Yes I'm inclined to agree.  Both are chaotic.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.15 seconds with 25 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.01s, 2q)