Logo by Fiery - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Visit us on facebook
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. March 29, 2024, 04:57:30 PM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: New Flame fractal algorithm for weight estimation?  (Read 2208 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
paxinum
Guest
« on: July 08, 2010, 05:34:46 PM »

I did some experimentation with my program, and I believe I found a nice way to estimate how much weight to put on each xform in the flame fractal algorithm:

http://www.math.su.se/~per/blogg.php?year=10&month=07#entry-2010-07-07-14-00-29
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Fractal Flames search algorithm? Programming Softology 0 738 Last post March 07, 2011, 11:01:46 AM
by Softology
fractal algorithm General Discussion lajevardi.am 3 2692 Last post March 11, 2012, 09:24:14 AM
by DarkBeam
estimation of fractal parameter from a SAR image using fraclab content asha 0 5721 Last post March 09, 2012, 05:31:16 PM
by asha
Requesting clarifications on the fractal flame algorithm Programming Sigillum Militum 6 3964 Last post April 01, 2012, 03:04:53 PM
by David Makin
Light weight Images Showcase (Rate My Fractal) Caleidoscope 0 1264 Last post October 13, 2017, 10:18:10 PM
by Caleidoscope

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.123 seconds with 22 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.006s, 2q)