Logo by Pauldelbrot - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Check out the originating "3d Mandelbulb" thread here
 
Home Help Search Gallery Downloads Login Register
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. November 26, 2025, 12:34:09 PM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Welcome to Fractal Forums > Fractal Software > Programming > Fragmentarium > Brute force raytracing + binary 0.9.12b = broken?
Pages: [1]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: Brute force raytracing + binary 0.9.12b = broken?  (Read 2033 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Roquen
Iterator
*
Posts: 180
« on: July 18, 2013, 11:15:10 AM »
I pulled the source from VC and copied all the example script source dir into my 0.9.12b install.  If I run tutorial 26 I simply get a black profile.  Is this expected behavior?
Logged
All code submitted by me is in the public domain. (http://unlicense.org/)
vinz
Iterator
*
Posts: 154
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2013, 08:41:45 PM »
same here ! i didn't spoke about i thought is was the expected behaviour. but let's see smiley
Logged
3dickulus
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 1558



WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2013, 02:35:48 AM »
I just tested tutorial 26 with both the original version and my hacked version and it seems to be working properly.

my gfx card is nVidia GeForce GT9800 (G92 compute 1.1 driver 304.roll eyes

it may be your card and/or driver version

test on another box to verify.

Version 0.9.12 ("Prague") github

if you have a graphic diff utility like kompare (linux/KDE) use it to compare a known working copy of the source with the version you re using, that will show you immediately what the differences are
« Last Edit: July 19, 2013, 02:43:40 AM by 3dickulus » Logged
Resistance is fertile...
You will be illuminated!

                            #B^] https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Fractals/fragmentarium
vinz
Iterator
*
Posts: 154
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2013, 03:17:58 AM »
just tested with your hacked version to see.
And i Confirm here i Only have silhouette or  Z depth like ...

Nvidia GTX580
GF110
shader compute 2.0
cuda driver 5.0
driver 311.06

perhaps a shader compute issue ?  hurt

And if I remember well Also the NODE raytracer from Kali never worked correctly here ...
« Last Edit: July 19, 2013, 03:30:33 AM by vinz » Logged
3dickulus
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 1558



WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2013, 03:30:55 AM »
if the original version shows the same problem I think it might be a hardware issue, both versions run fine on my machine.
Logged
Resistance is fertile...
You will be illuminated!

                            #B^] https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Fractals/fragmentarium
vinz
Iterator
*
Posts: 154
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2013, 03:35:18 AM »
i don't have made a new try recently, but if  remember well i had the same result with 0.9.12 and 0.9.12b that's why i thought finally  it  was the expected result.

but yes probably an hardware incompatibility for what i've understood there are a lot of changes in compute 2.0
« Last Edit: July 19, 2013, 03:36:59 AM by vinz » Logged
Roquen
Iterator
*
Posts: 180
« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2013, 08:16:35 AM »
Oh bother.  I was afraid of that and was simply hoping I could simply compile a new exe.
Logged
All code submitted by me is in the public domain. (http://unlicense.org/)
Syntopia
Fractal Molossus
**
Posts: 681



syntopiadk
WWW
« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2013, 09:38:16 AM »
Hi,

Have you tried with the exe from the brute-raytracer thread:
http://www.fractalforums.com/3d-fractal-generation/rendering-3d-fractals-without-distance-estimators/msg54477/#msg54477

The script ought to work on a GTX 580, since it works on a GTX 570 (unless the latest driver updates have changed something).
Logged
vinz
Iterator
*
Posts: 154
« Reply #8 on: July 19, 2013, 02:37:42 PM »
Quote from: Syntopia on July 19, 2013, 09:38:16 AM
Have you tried with the exe from the brute-raytracer thread:
http://www.fractalforums.com/3d-fractal-generation/rendering-3d-fractals-without-distance-estimators/msg54477/#msg54477

Yes it seems to work on this one .

* tut26.jpg (109.18 KB, 1206x693 - viewed 274 times.)
Logged
Roquen
Iterator
*
Posts: 180
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2013, 03:45:16 PM »
Excellent!  That build works for me as well.
Logged
All code submitted by me is in the public domain. (http://unlicense.org/)
Pages: [1]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Juliabrot raytracing and distance estimation 3D Fractal Generation fractalrebel 1 2831 Last post November 22, 2009, 01:32:26 PM
by David Makin
Folding, IFS, raytracing and continuity (new) Theories & Research DarkBeam 0 697 Last post November 03, 2011, 04:56:55 PM
by DarkBeam
For Jesse, article about raytracing and stuff Mandelbulb 3d DarkBeam 4 1389 Last post November 06, 2011, 05:18:59 PM
by Jesse
Brute RotJulia Images Showcase (Rate My Fractal) Kali 2 1117 Last post October 02, 2012, 01:08:55 AM
by Kali
Inigo Quilez's brute force global illumination Fragmentarium « 1 2 3 » eiffie 35 10410 Last post June 13, 2013, 06:35:05 PM
by vinz

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.699 seconds with 27 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.012s, 2q)