DarkBeam
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
     
Posts: 2512
Fragments of the fractal -like the tip of it
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: February 08, 2012, 08:16:02 AM » |
|
lately I do some confusion... but the home is the sticky thread 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No sweat, guardian of wisdom!
|
|
|
|
cytotox
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2012, 11:35:55 AM » |
|
from your parameter i only get this parallelepiped
did i miss something ?
Yes, I get the same image, though I updated M3D as well as Darkbeams formulas yesterday (and again today). There must be something amiss still ...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkBeam
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
     
Posts: 2512
Fragments of the fractal -like the tip of it
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: February 08, 2012, 11:58:41 AM » |
|
don't know how to help Anyway for jesse I get this, not good - as I was thinking. Because the formula is extremely sensible to small variations; the limit is a circle and you do not get here easily.  The only way to get a good result is my non uniform z scaling and afaik this is exactly Apophisis' approach for this fractal. Too bad... Else you don't see the plane tiled correctly. The plane is filled on high iters, and if you scale x&y the limits are not reached. So... to get a visually appealing figure you must go non-conformal 
|
No sweat, guardian of wisdom!
|
|
|
|
ericr
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: February 08, 2012, 05:33:15 PM » |
|
sorry but where is the formula apollo-3d corrected by jesse
ERICR
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkBeam
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
     
Posts: 2512
Fragments of the fractal -like the tip of it
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: February 08, 2012, 05:36:59 PM » |
|
Not by Jesse by me.  ^ enclosed with that post's m3f ... more messed up than corrected 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No sweat, guardian of wisdom!
|
|
|
Jesse
Download Section
Fractal Schemer

Posts: 1013
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: February 08, 2012, 10:38:11 PM » |
|
Ok, got the test version - you can delete it for getting not in trouble with your version.
It seems not really to represent the latest suggestion, as it was. And i guess the XY scaling is applied twice or so, and Z is affecting the filling too... very strange.
I guess we should do spend some more time into it because it really should work like the original version, only the Z scaling should be different. If you don't like to, i would try to make it by myself (but could take some time).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bib
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: February 08, 2012, 10:50:22 PM » |
|
I still don't understand Apollo3D. More 2D than 3D to me
EDIT/ OK, got the fixed one. Nice!
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 08, 2012, 10:53:54 PM by bib »
|
Logged
|
Between order and disorder reigns a delicious moment. (Paul Valéry)
|
|
|
DarkBeam
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
     
Posts: 2512
Fragments of the fractal -like the tip of it
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: February 08, 2012, 11:22:54 PM » |
|
I can pass you the source code Jesse (have to write it for you) Hi Jeremie 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No sweat, guardian of wisdom!
|
|
|
Jesse
Download Section
Fractal Schemer

Posts: 1013
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: February 08, 2012, 11:44:48 PM » |
|
I can pass you the source code Jesse (have to write it for you)
If you got the original formula in a higher language, that would be the best i think. Then i can test it in pascal direct in the program, would be even more efficient than doing stuff over email and you had to write everytime another version. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jesse
Download Section
Fractal Schemer

Posts: 1013
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: February 10, 2012, 02:24:11 PM » |
|
I have an easy solution: Just add a DE fix parameter at the end of the formula parameters and scale the global DE scale with this value, that should be about 1.2! So you only need to add this somewhere in your apollo2d formula: fld qword [esi+$70] fmul qword [edi-$60] //where your DEfix parameter is fstp qword [esi+$70] The only change in shapes is about the DEstop value, because the DE is now calcuated better, the DEstop might be somewhere else. Lower DEstop if this should be a prob. Test without DEfix (upper image) and DEfix of 1.2 (lower image), both Raystep multiplier of 0.8: 
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bib
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: February 10, 2012, 02:29:41 PM » |
|
Yes Jesse, that will be great to do Apollo fractal without noise. I absolutely love them! Thank you and Darkbeam!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Between order and disorder reigns a delicious moment. (Paul Valéry)
|
|
|
DarkBeam
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
     
Posts: 2512
Fragments of the fractal -like the tip of it
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: February 10, 2012, 05:37:14 PM » |
|
oh yeahhh!!!! Do not know why I did not try this. If I multiply z & the DE scale by the same value (the zmul... there is no need to introduce a defix because defix=zmul  ) it works for just any zmul! And with a perfect accuracy! You are a genius 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No sweat, guardian of wisdom!
|
|
|
DarkBeam
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
     
Posts: 2512
Fragments of the fractal -like the tip of it
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: February 10, 2012, 09:14:09 PM » |
|
Updated the official DL file 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No sweat, guardian of wisdom!
|
|
|
|
bib
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: February 10, 2012, 09:27:29 PM » |
|
Updated the official DL file  Did you fix Apollo3D? Do you have an example param pliz?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Between order and disorder reigns a delicious moment. (Paul Valéry)
|
|
|
Jesse
Download Section
Fractal Schemer

Posts: 1013
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: February 10, 2012, 09:51:43 PM » |
|
No, do it seperate - not like Zmul. Edit: Ok, like Abs(Zmul) should be ok!
And we should do update only the newformula zips, don't make everyone download the whole package again. Only this time because the Apollo is already inside. But in future...
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 10, 2012, 10:02:53 PM by Jesse »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|