Logo by KRAFTWERK - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Visit us on facebook
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. March 29, 2024, 10:22:44 AM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: A fractal way of making sense of our experiences. Please contribute!  (Read 37634 times)
Description: Notions, insights, methods of knowing, paradigms and procedures.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #60 on: December 16, 2014, 10:52:42 PM »

Explaining the dialectic as a gradual revealing of deeper and wider contexts through comparing and contrasting and perceiving a lack which drives a search for a deeper truth.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/yjuELzK7&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/yjuELzK7&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/yjuELzK7-u0&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/yjuELzK7-u0&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1</a>

The trinity of revelations is a fractal development pattern that ultimately should lead to the truth about The Triune God, whether that be a Christian or other religious or even philosophical one .
Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #61 on: January 09, 2015, 09:27:11 AM »

Chadafrican on Ziszjeks praxis of Hegelian philosophy.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/lDkQeTlkpBA&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/lDkQeTlkpBA&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/lDkQeTlkpBA&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/lDkQeTlkpBA&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1</a>

Clear, but not easy listening.

I take from it an overview of Hegelian Philosophy In a historical developmental context, really showing how Hegelian philosophy in the west is still the dominant research tool and explanatory model for philosophy.

I think it dominates because it is fundamentally Fractal in structure.
Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #62 on: February 02, 2015, 12:44:34 PM »

The divine fractal order of Boethius

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/zQvH8S6nCbw&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/zQvH8S6nCbw&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1</a>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/zQvH8S6nCbw&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/zQvH8S6nCbw&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1</a>
Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #63 on: May 05, 2016, 12:20:27 PM »

Newtons Charge
Charge is a concept not often explained
It is a potential to force, accelerate or give motive to objects , inherent in space
Newton devised a system of absolute charge based on the Galilean observations of the Jovian system
The concept was given 3 intimately connected descriptors. The first emphasises the absolute nature of charge or force it is the nearest to zero point energy that Newton gets and in fact is a link between the divine and the mundane. Later he philosophises about the electrical nature of charge in this absolute sense. So he asks us to assume absolute charge exists
The second is the centrally acting nature of charge . Because it is absolute it is central to a point but not just one point every point in a system. This complex notion was expressed poetically by Galileo in the Dialogo . Today we call it fractally scale free or even zero point! The important aspect of this central action was that it was accelerative throughout the sphere of its influence . The law of acceleration was for philosophers to determine . Few know that Neeton tried many
Laws before announcing the inverse square law as most appropriate for gravity, even fewer know that Sir Roger Cotes was about to propose a logarithmic law !
In general the binomial series expansion was
The most convenient calculative svhema to base measurment systems on

The third aspect of charge in this absolute system
Was motive
This was how Neeton brought these general principles into the everyday methods of weights
And measures . Within this
Centrally acting sphere of influence material bodies were given motive or motion in such a way that comparisons of the actions could be made by balance and spring force. This was achieved by using a geometric product if material bulk and accelerative displacement .
These measurements of motive or motion by dynamic equilibrium thus combinatorially encapsulated/ summed the total effect of charge both locally and within the specified absolute system . This meant for each observed absolute system the same laws could be applied and the ensemble Of absolute systems could be calculated as a combinatorial sum for which it was found the same laws seemed to apply
That is until further observations gave a lie to this assumption 
Dark energy and dark matter was born as an alternative charge! Xx
Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #64 on: May 06, 2016, 05:01:38 AM »

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fePQdJNVF9g
When Newton set out his absolute system he based it spatiometrically on the sphere. In fact all Pythagorean Astrologers base their explanations on the sphere . Because of this Euclids last Stoikeia deals ŵith geodesic measurements on the sphere. Newton Halley and all competent Geometers including Wren were conversant with the frame of reference required to describe spherical regions. Thus Newtons framework was richer than the standard Cartesian framework including the circular arc and tangent.

Most scholars off Newton at the time therefore failed to grasp the complex interconnection between the components of his framework and insisted that Ohysicsvand forces and accelerations could only act in straight lines!
Simply put Newtons pulley and rope Mechnics assumes tension acts circularly around a pulley !

It was not until Örsted that a philosopher was brave enough to consider nature was more rotational than his peers believed. He was able to demonstrate a rotational force exists in space around a conductor/ inductor under charge of a battery or voltaic cell .

It is known that his peers were largely mystified by his philosophy, only Ampère understood accepted and demonstrated this circular force of magnetism.

In Newtons systèm the natural path of a celestial body is curved" the Right or Good line is not always straight! As one progresses through his acioms at the beginning of the Astrological Principles the right path changes from straight at ground level to curved at celestiàl level.

Motion in Newtons system is thus geodesic and trochoidal.
Now Einstein reworked Newton using Modern Mathematics . Basically he said the curvature of the sphere and within the sphere is equated to the Gravitational product!
However the mathematics is the same as curvature is equated the spherical form.
Because Einstein used a 4 tensor as a model of space-time " this means that the structure of the equations will be similar to those that include  measures for density! Consequently they give the same result!
Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #65 on: May 10, 2016, 08:48:09 AM »

The circle is the fundamental form by which we construct all others .
This is the Pythagorean " secret " universal structure.
The line segment that is so called good is constructed by intersecting circle and sphere boundaries. A circle boundary itself requires only a stiff object that contacts a surface ( any surface) in two places. Providing that "point" of contact on the stiff object remains the same during the rotation process around the other "fixed" point of contact a figure within a spherical shell can be " dragged out".  These drawn lines or skesis are not necessarily good or regular or straight but they are consistent by the stiffness constraint.
By intersecting these lines drawn from the two poits of contact we construct a set of intersections that form a circular Plane , and it is this citcular plane that is the ideal plane whose intersection points we use to construct plain straight lines and rectilinear figures .

We note parallelism in this plane and quarter arcs of the plane boundary reference Ortho-gonality.
We note the orthogonal intersection of the diameter based triangles with points on the perimeter.

There are many other invariant constructions we note within these circular constraints based on stiffness.

How do we record some of the important ratios?
Using a diameter we can mark off ratios as segments of the diameter, and we can carry the information on a knotted rope, which when stretched taut can form the basis for unfolding these proportions by cut les of those proportions .
In particular we can unfold the segments into rectangles , parallelograms or other complex combinatorial patterns like opening a penknife, or set of blades.

And so logos( ratio) and arithmod( rectangular mosaics) are related by counting the number of arc segments between each manifestation of an Arithmos. This count is now called the logarithm or exponent based on Bruges work, but understood by Napiers and Briggs exposition of the system.

From this we can grasp how Cotes in his Harmonium Mensuram  noted
Ix= ln(cosx + isinx)
That is the arc associated with the right triangle whose sides are lines cosx and sinx is in fact x!  Here I is used to signify an arc measure within an orthogonal scheme, but also to signify a magnitude that squares to -1 . Placing it before the sin indicates this length is different to the cos length by a direction of a quarter turn! These magnitudes are not homogenous and so can be combined but not subsumed in a larger magnitude of the same kind.

Why -1?
Because our homogenous lines have 2 directions running into each other! O e direction we can call +1 the other -1 and now we have a Dynamic system that records rotations and translations . Of course the totations are semi circular so not very general. sqrt(-1) introduces a quarter turn into this notation by means of the surd sign.

The surd sign represents processes that involve circular arc constructions so it has always indicated a rotational aspect of our Spaciometry . We were just blinded by the incredulous opinion of our forebears who never expressed processes in symbolic arithmetic and so never used the surd sign. Instead they used completing the square or making into a square technically in Latin "ex quadrature " from which we derived our square radix or square root idea.

Of course we forgot about the underlying circle Spaciometry, and thus symmetry of rotation!
All units are expressible in Eulers magical notation but that notation expresses rather than discovers a practice we have always used, sometimes called neusis of adjusting lines in space by rotation until they pass through 2 points!

This is where we started ,2 points in space associated with citcular( stiff) rotation.

How we express non stiff dynamics is the subject of fluid dynamics .
Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #66 on: May 12, 2016, 08:10:47 AM »

http://m.youtube.com/waych?v=ZijhIaJQILE
Here the problem of classical physics is well explained .
Note how the wave concept was not sufficient .
Why?

The answer is the incredible misguided notion of a " wave"!
The sine curve was adopted as typifying a wave ! This was a complete mistaken use of the sine curve.
The sine curve traditionally was related to the circle, that is to circular rotation. The sine is a quarter arc rotation decomposition onto an orthogonal axis . The cosine , versine and many other ratios are derived from circular rotation .
Newton had centuries before resolved circular kinematics into sine and cosine measures on orthogonal axes!

Laplace LaGrange and others assumed natural laws were based on straight lines, there were no circular forces. The result was that rotation was considered to be torque!

Circular forces of course rotate freely and therefore accelerated rotation would spin up to unimaginable rotational FREQUENCIES! . Note how velocity is replaced by frequency.

But frequency is related to complete rotations, not pendulum swings!

What is a wave? Well clearly a pendulum swing !
No!

Careful observation of water waves revels they are rotating cylindrical forms or vortices by another name!

When you realise that vortices are fundamental natural phenomna at all scales then quantum becomes understandable .
Fractal distribution in space also becomes very important to become familiar with.
DeMoivre took the first stps to develop a measure of probability that was based on rotation!
Both Newton and thus his student DeMoivre knew that the sine and cosine values could be used to solve certain types of Multinomials ( later called polynomials) . This meant that certain polynomials could be used to describe rotations and that meand periodical or cyclical events! This attracted DevMoivre to apply the sine and cosine tables to the prediction of card game results. This was the notion of likelihood or probability, first explored by Cardano.
DeMoivre was in fact in competition with another Natural Philosopher with regard to the laws of probability but it was agreed that ade Moivre took primacy.
Later Boltzman, Gauss and others worked on the statistical problem of errors in calculations . Again this stochastic problem was similar to probability . The intention to get an accurate result bounds the error and makes the errors cyclical in a probability sense that STATISTCAL.

Boltzmnn statistical approach produced accurate results but it took a while for Statistics to be put on a sound footing of weighted measures normal distributions expected values and standard deviations.

The crossover between statistics and probability is in the unit interval! Between 0 and 1 the results of probability can be applied to statistical situation. This is a strange interval as is -1 to 0. But this is the realm of quantum Mechnaics where statistics, probability and rotation combine, fracially .

We cn best apply our measures to natural phnomena if we assume a vorticular structure is fundamentally what is measurable by our systems.

Entanglement is explained as two counter rotating systems, Einstins left nd tight gloves only they are rotating like spinning coins in opposite patterns! When we determine one we impute the other as Einstein suspected but we do not know the frequency or mplitude of the paired phenomena ,
The event that creates the dual rotating( roulette patterned) phenomena creates counter rotating phenomena . Such phenomena re in superposition that is a tru true made up of rotations in multiple interference patterns . When we measure we collapse this rotional  complex we determine one of its major rotational modes . We then impute a counter major rotational mode in the entangled phenomena. This will be there because rotation demands counter rotation for contiguous regions of space.

Einsteins quantum explanation of photoelectric response is indicative of rotationl frequencies of vortices required to create smaller vorticular events. The quantum is a rotationl complex a vortex very confusingly called a particle!  A lump of energy, and many other descriptors like corpuscle etc are reduced to the term particle. Scientists can only deal with a certain level of complexity. Fortunately rotation compresses complexity into a simple vorticular notion that looks like a conical form.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7GSUrPUFuEs

Sprites are such events and as you see the two counter phenomena are created together, when an upward sprite is seen a downward sprite is always there too, rather the rotational wave exhibits reflection, refraction and diffraction .
Amplitude is the other factor in quantum Mechanics, and this is the diameter of the region in coherence with a vorticular description . Amplitudes will form a fractal distribution that is bell curved shaped and of course this is a plot against frequency . Taking this information we can Fourier transform it by inverse Fourier into a Fourier " petiod"  that is a confined spatial form
« Last Edit: May 12, 2016, 08:26:14 AM by jehovajah » Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #67 on: May 12, 2016, 09:28:33 AM »

http://m.youtube.coe/watch?v=VJ6MAFkP6wQ
The problems of Hubble expanding space are indicators of rotational symmetry . If a galaxy remains in the same spatial position either it is moving proportional to its radial distance or they do not move but we rotate relative to those fixed galaxies!
Einsteins relativity is first proposed by Newtin. Newton takes a view that systems are fractally absolute, based on Galileos observations . Einstein wanted to get away from this absolute premise/ assumption. It turns out if you do then you can only make sense of local events by classical physics. You have to spit a sphere of observation and an absolute of the speed of light . Using this and other assumptions or principles he constructs an alternative way to describe physical phenomna in non absolute terms.
The question is : was it useful? Increasingly it seems to be seen as flawed
Bohr sets out a rotational description of atomic structure . Because of the assumption that particles were solid and waves were not the understnding of the measurements stopped right there.

The simplest explanation was and is to use a fluid dynamic paradigm and vortices .
The vortex is a complex structure which is fractal and contains vortices within it! Where these vortices are is not determined because of rotational superposition that is constructive nd destructive interference of rotations.

The uncertainty principle does not deny the certainty principle! At the quantum level vortices are paramount. You cannot use straight lines! Classicl mechanics cam to rely on straight lines. At the macro level scientists can fudge most explanations into straight line resolutions but at the quantum levlma straight line is a non physical construct. The circular RC is the best measure we can use and that means the sine ratio, the probability laws and the statistical measures are our best means of measuring phenomna.
Quarks are a little bit like Alice in Wonderlands cat! So now we have Schtoedingers Cat and Alices cat.
My friends we mouses are in trouble! Xxx

What simplifies all of these observations for measurement is rotation, that is trochoidal rotation .
« Last Edit: May 12, 2016, 10:03:42 AM by jehovajah » Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #68 on: May 17, 2016, 12:07:16 PM »

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RnaG6T-C14Q
When I chose the title Newtons Charge it was because we are taught  that Newton discovered the laws of Gravity. In factvNewton simply constructed a geometric algebra of sufficient flexibility to describe gravitational behaviour by positing a space influence that was absolute to some central point in a fractal way and in a fractal system. Thus the 3 descriptors of force behaviour give no causal framework, and Newton knew this well enough to not commit the mistakes of his students!
He in turn searched for a causative active principle Alchemically and perhaps found a solution in the nascent notions of the Electric Fluid perceived in space itself, but he directly asserted magnetism as a candidate. this was in line with Gilberts suggestion.
Charge thus was and is a potential to drive or exert force on objects, and scientists discovered that this potential came in opposites.
The simple plus and minus is simple precisely because philosophically we can not derive cause beyond these observations. Thus by distinguishing them as fundamental Elementaries we signal no further fruitful exploration is possible.
In fact we never do go behind this fundamental but rather use them judiciously to describe ore complex structures.
Now we think the label electric changes things, but it does not. Wecan replace any label by magnetic and reach the same descriptive conclusions.

However one further characteristic of Newtons absolute system in my mind favours magnetism as more fundamental than electricism, and that is rotation.

Using rotations I can develop a system of multiple charges that model complex magnetic, sonic, thermic electic and gravitics behaviours, but the fundamental structure is rotational/ vorticular. Magnetic behaviours are demonstrably rotational.
Gerald Pollocks gentle musings make so much sense of dat that is currently bathed in highly suspect and complex descriptors .
Amplitude,Freauency and Phase of rotation are fundamental descriptors of a trochoidal model of behaviour. Such a model potentially enables us to describe every o served behaviour by one system
Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #69 on: May 18, 2016, 12:43:52 PM »

http://magneticuniverse.com/discussion/129/a-sound-magnetic-base#latest
The magnetic universe forum is a collection of individuals who study zed Leedskalnins elegant ideas on magnetism. That is because Ed is just like you and me full of smarts, philosophical, and interested in natural powers, but not interested in being squashed by the academic machine!
The Electric Universe however is waiting in the wings vying to take over the lead position when the current scientific paradigm collapses. Either way they both refuse to start again from scratch!
As a philosopher of the foundations of Thought patterns I find myself drawn to the less busy forums that help me explore and think through my observations . I like to start at the roots. This would be hopeless if in fact the way we construct out patterns of thought were not inductive, iterative,self referential, tautological and thus fractal in the sense that Benoit used to describe it as " almost self similarity".

There are many strict definitions of fractal, but Benoit named the field on the toughness of the forms he was perceiving, forms that could not be described by regular geometrical forms, but yet by forms almost similar to the regular ones, repeated, recurred,iterated into fascinating patterns that achieved some invariance .
If the Mandelbrot set was unrecognisably chaotic we would not be celebrating the nature of fractals! At the same time the iconic image appears only in specific  circumstances showing us that we can pick out invariance but it is still only ever a small part of the possibilities out there.

The tools we use here to generate art and pattern and structure are the thing! Developing expertise with these tools and developing new tools may help us explain natural behaviours in a complex but consistent way.
What it won't do is give me absolute reality. Newton describes how he set up reasonable absolutes for his philosophical project. But he was clear that these assumptions though reasonable, have to prove their utility.
To this day we have barely varied these assumptions, except in the case of Einstein and Bohr, and these variations are of detail not fundamental generality.
The one aspect of Newtons assumptions, that of a rotational action, be it a trochoidal force path or a lineal impulse path in multiple orientations, that has not been explored as Newton envisaged, that is using the circular arc, that one is my obsession
we cn restate, and I sometimes do Newtons first axiom of motion: an object will remain: at rest or in a uniform motion in a trochoidal arc!  That Newton chose the straight line from among all the trochoids is a rhetorical concession to nagger the minds of his audience unfamiliar with advance Apollonian 'Geometry'.
Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #70 on: May 24, 2016, 12:12:18 AM »

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-stm/
A detailed discussion of Newtons solution to many philosophical disputes and disagreements.
The problems are identified but not empathised with.
What is space ? What is place ? What is motion ?

Maybe you dont think about such things but are you real? What is "You"?
In that context where to explain in words your apprehension of the answer to these questions is the task you will grasp the slipperiness of nailing these ideas down.

The concept of the Truth also factors into this: what is The Truth and why should we pursue it? The belief innGods in am immanent yet other reality a spiritual reality . What is spirit?
The platonic game of Form or Idea intrigued philosophers of all religious persuasions : you choose whether you accept forms as real and impressive on the soul or idea as real and reified through the soul .
Again in this context the questions about space, time and motion resonate.

The word absolute means "away to sole ", that is to strip away everything and reveal the singular nature of a thing its independence of any other thing . God of course is absolute andvthusbhe dwells in absolute space and time . And only he/she knows the true motion of all things .
That is a religious answer, what is a philosophers answer?
Newton tries to supply that .
Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #71 on: May 24, 2016, 10:20:49 AM »

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=S1CB3_1KQGI
In fractal foundations of Mathematics I posited that the fundamental measurement schemes are fractals. They may be uniformly constructed, and so special, but nevertheless they possess self similarity one of the features Benoit identified in his exploration of fractals. To be clear he tweaked it a bit and used the peturbation: almost self similar.
This small change leads to dynamism under iterative calculations, making Calculayion process a driver for small sunthesised differences that add up to a limit sculpture if a cut off or bail out regime is imposed.

This calculative iteration then informs a geometrical application or interpretation.

Some more direct synthetical approaches to fractals involve using a form repeated( iterated) via translation, rotation or reflection, projection or some combination of these spatial transforms, into the entirety of space.
Projection is the general notion of magnification with straight lines or circles used to do the projecting.
Geometries are often characterised by the kind of projection utilised in synthesis of spatial forms and patterns.

Here Norman simply demonstrates that what we may call number has a pattern of representation even in the symbolic format. What you should realise is that Arithmoi are geometric mosaics and it is the count symbols of these mosaics that have come to be thought of as numbers . However the Indian Shunya cyclical systems simply arrange a set ofv9 symbols according to the pattern of gear wheels either concentrically arranged or systematically in contiguous relation in space,
The decimal place value system is a gear chain of ratios that recognise that when the symbol0 is reached the next gear up moves one tooth.the Shunya means "Everything" or in this specific case " full "

It is no mean observation to assert that we are not capable of perceiving" nothing", thus any notion of absolute space based on Nothing is not apprehensible. Absolute space is something whole and entire and independent of its parts, that is why it is absolute that is washed away of all influences absolved of any dependency, sole and totally the prime of all things which being part of it are causatively influenced by it but can not influence it . It is Aristotles prime mover conception . It is the ground of all analysis and the summit of all synthesis , and is often called the Monad in Neo Pythagorean philosophy, the Monad is Shunya , but prejudice seeks to demote Shunya to " nothing"
Shunya is Everything , it is absolute, The Absolute symbolised by an intact w-hole spherical / circular symbol

When I begin to analyse Shunya, or the Absolute I impose experience of extension and intension onto my experiential continuum . I impose surface and side and orientation and direction on extension, and intensity on intension , and in that experience Panta Rhei and I experience rhythm and rhyme the variation of the flowing change from which I derive first the sensations of motion as well as place and then by memories the notion of recorded Tyme.
To impose an absolute time requires a conception of The Absolutte which remembers and is conscious of all it's variations but the independent cause of them all : that is Newtons God, but corvally the fractally distributed conscious universe that is entire. And the prime Cause.
If we ask what is beyond this we show a lack of apprehension of the notion absolute, but we may be satisfied by a fractal synonymous conception that as the magnitude extension scale increases the perceived patterns re occur at larger and larger scales! We therefore rest our enquiry on what may be known, accepting that it is a copy or reflection or consequence of a much greater similarity which may be ascribed to a mysterious nation ofvGods or one Sole Deity reigning Absolutely.

Our systematic "Logic" therefore is merely language that describes as fact or myth or both the perceptions of the found( that is sensed by visual, auditory kinaesthetic and proprioceptive sensory meshes) " reality" .

This reality we must still chose according to Platos game of Idea or Form .
Do I express another reality through my " soul" in my reality, constructing imperfect copies, or do the forms in my reality so impress on my soul that I construct an ideal reality to apprehend and comprehend them in general? Or Both?
I accept as I choose and thus decide by that acceptance of the choice I made. And this then reifies my reality . Not your reality but solely mine!
Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #72 on: May 28, 2016, 01:24:35 PM »

What is  the meaning of m in Newtons philosophy?

Most miss this out and jump straight to the second law to explain it.
https://www.phas.ubc.ca/~berciu/PHILIP/TEACHING/PHYS340/SLIDES/PDF/Newton-Leibniz.pdf

Of course Newton explains it in the definitions to his Philoophy
m is defined as the quantity of matter and is the product of a measure called bulk or volume and the density of the object measured hydrostaticaily.

This the quantity of matter Is a quantity of standard volumes of water .

So why is mass so enigmatic? It is because the absolute system is fundamental to the accelerative centrifugal and centripetal forces that are part of its design and definition. Thus the standard volume of water has a standard mass if and only if it is N incompressible fluid . The compressibility of fluid may differ on different planetary systems so I compressibility is fundamental to a universal quantity.

Rest mass, kinetic mass, inertial mass all adjectively alter the compressibility of water under those conditions.
Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #73 on: June 22, 2016, 10:07:55 AM »

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qvyiq0S5nyw
A short course worth looking into
Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
jehovajah
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2749


May a trochoid in the void bring you peace


WWW
« Reply #74 on: June 23, 2016, 11:08:12 AM »

Do you understand Zenos Paradox?
Parmenides and Zeno like Socrates and Plato loved to play games with people's minds to teach them to think!
So the tortoise and the athlete, the flight of the arrow are analytical lessons!
How do you Analyse anything! You loose it from the top down( ana: above, top, new, again)
Thus you engage in a process of fractal distribution.
The ancient Greeks of Zenos time announced the principle of exhaustion! We have to stop when we are exhausted!
But then we have to re synthesise all the fractal parts we have analysed!
So if you say: the athlete can never pass the tortoise or the arrow can never move, you have simply forgotten the process you started, an analysis from the top down to its fractal parts, and you have more importantly forgotten to re synthesis all the parts!
For example the athlete is running at a constant pace, as is the tortoise . If you analyse from the point of view of the tortoise the athlete moves in that proportion to its movements, similarly, if you analyse from the point of view of the athlete the tortoise moves in that proportion to his movements. The analyses( plural)are consistent in the proportion and show the athlete covers more ground than the tortoise but always in the same proportion. In addition the tortoise always co ers less an less ground as the athlete approaches unti
 The athlete. At he's and surpasses the tortoise. Our infinite analysis has a finite resolution a limit even if we want to continue the analysis forever!
Time and exhaustion can not be excluded from our ability to process an analysis or synthesise a resolution.

The arrow?
Fundamentally our measures are local. We extend them to dynàmic and universal scales, not always justifiably!
So Einsteins postulate that the speed of light is constant is no more than this measurement issue. We can o ly measure the speed of light in one fixed reference frame . We have to assume that the answer is independent of any reference frame! But we know the speed of light is a bulk property of materials! Thus it is not a constant unless the material is uniformly constant, and our reference frame is made of s h material!

We have no reason to expect a length in dynamic motion will measure the same as a length in relative rest, because the measurement scheme is different, but that is not the same as saying a fixed length physically alters in straight line translation in uniform motion . We just do t know!

High speed photography is our best tool for measuring this phenomenon. We know from frame analysis that physical length is on average maintained in stiff materials, but in liquids the deformations are obvious and interesting.
Quantum mechanics, the black body curve all have a rotational explanation in particular whole number relationships between the measured outputs.
Logged

May a trochoid of ¥h¶h iteratively entrain your Logos Response transforming into iridescent fractals of orgasmic delight and joy, with kindness, peace and gratitude at all scales within your experience. I beg of you to enrich others as you have been enriched, in vorticose pulsations of extravagance!
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Adobe Photoshop Tutorial -- Making Fractal Brushes Format, Printing & Post Production Nahee_Enterprises 1 10746 Last post June 28, 2007, 08:34:29 PM
by heneganj
Making Money with Fractal Art Art Discussions « 1 2 3 » Nahee_Enterprises 30 26342 Last post November 03, 2015, 12:18:16 PM
by Sockratease
Making a large fractal terrain using a grid structure. Help & Support « 1 2 » igloomedia 29 4452 Last post November 14, 2010, 09:10:06 PM
by igloomedia
What open source fractal programs might I contribute to? Let's collaborate on something! fullerenedream 5 5424 Last post June 11, 2016, 08:28:01 PM
by zebastian

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.472 seconds with 25 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.011s, 2q)