Logo by KRAFTWERK - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Support us via Flattr FLATTR Link
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. December 02, 2025, 05:13:26 PM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: Intel® Concurrent Collections for C++  (Read 1150 times)
Description: Fantastic C++ framework for us :)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
utak3r
Alien
***
Posts: 26


WWW
« on: June 09, 2010, 02:13:10 PM »

I don't know if you know this, guys - I didnt knew.
Intel give us the complete C++ framework, designed by one of the best experts in parallel computing: Kath Knobe.
It is a framework (plus additional graph editing tool) for developing parallel computing applications fast and easy. It runs both Linux and Windows.

You can find it here:
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-concurrent-collections-for-cc/
Logged
knighty
Fractal Iambus
***
Posts: 819


« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2010, 09:46:53 PM »

Thanks for the link.  smiley
Logged
cbuchner1
Fractal Phenom
******
Posts: 443


« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2010, 10:28:02 PM »


Is this similar to Apple's Grand Central Dispatch technology?
Logged
hobold
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 573


« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2010, 03:28:18 PM »

Intel offers "Thread building blocks", which can be very similar to Grand Central Dispatch if you use their analog of "blocks". If you don't use the blocks, you are back to square one, and have to write lots of code just to initialize stuff.

All in all, I like GCD better for its simplicity. GCD doesn't make the hard problems easy, but it does make the easy stuff trivial. Intel's Thread Building Blocks in contrast offer more control to experts, but a higher barrier of entry to newcomers. Intel urgently needs to rewrite their examples in the newer, simpler syntax; and they should offer a simplified scheduler just like Apple does with the prioritized queues.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Intel sponsoring ? Discuss Fractal Forums ker2x 10 2147 Last post May 13, 2010, 05:05:45 PM
by cKleinhuis
Intel OpenCL SDK (Alpha) is available for testing. Programming ker2x 0 1431 Last post November 17, 2010, 04:53:56 PM
by ker2x
New Parallel Compiler by Intel Programming hobold 3 1722 Last post June 28, 2011, 04:00:29 AM
by hobold
Intel OpenCL SDK 1.1 Released Programming ker2x 0 1603 Last post July 07, 2011, 11:01:39 AM
by ker2x
anyone ever use integrated intel openCL device ? Programming ker2x 11 3724 Last post November 17, 2016, 09:07:35 AM
by woronoi

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.374 seconds with 24 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.012s, 2q)