Logo by kr0mat1k - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Check out the originating "3d Mandelbulb" thread here
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. March 29, 2024, 11:08:39 AM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: Why z²+c and not a²+b ?  (Read 2444 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Chillheimer
Global Moderator
Fractal Schemer
******
Posts: 972


Just another fractal being floating by..


chilli.chillheimer chillheimer
WWW
« on: February 13, 2016, 01:48:31 PM »

Hi!
I was just wondering, is there a special reason why Mandelbrot used z and c as his variables. Do they stand for anything specific? Or did he just choose these 'randomly'?
cheers!
Logged

--- Fractals - add some Chaos to your life and put the world in order. ---
claude
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 563



WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2016, 03:29:30 PM »

The key paper seems to be:

FRACTAL ASPECTS OF THE ITERATION OF z → Λz(1- z) FOR COMPLEX Λ AND z
Benoit B. Mandelbrot
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Volume 357, Nonlinear Dynamics pages 249–259, December 1980
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb29690.x/abstract
(but full paper is pricy so I didn't read it)

So originally it was \lambda, possibly named after the logistic map.

z is common in complex analysis, presumably because you need a variable name and z = x + i y is the next in the alphabet, also common is w = u + i v.

It turns out that all quadratic polynomials are equivalent to the z²+c form (conjugate is a keyword to search for), so the exact form doesn't matter so much when you get down to abstract mathematical properties.
Logged
Chillheimer
Global Moderator
Fractal Schemer
******
Posts: 972


Just another fractal being floating by..


chilli.chillheimer chillheimer
WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2016, 04:24:22 PM »

thank you claude..
so it doesn't really matter and it wouldn't be wrong to explain it as a->a²+b to people with even less math background than I have?

I noticed that some newbies are a bit confused by z & c and why they are important. so if you take a & b  to explain the same thing it might be a bit easier..
Logged

--- Fractals - add some Chaos to your life and put the world in order. ---
claude
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 563



WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2016, 04:33:53 PM »

exactly, as long as the symbols are consistent it doesn't make a difference, it's more about the shape of the equation.  you could even write it  fieryfiery² +  angel


conjugacy is a slightly more advanced concept, it's discussed here (but it doesn't seem very clear language) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_quadratic_polynomial
« Last Edit: February 13, 2016, 04:40:12 PM by claude » Logged
hobold
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 573


« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2016, 06:42:11 PM »

Some more math trivia/history regarding notation of Mandelbrot's famous formula.

TL;DR: the subsitution "z := a + b*i" for a complex number is older than Mandelbrot, and will keep showing up in the literature. Likewise "c" is a relatively common convention to hint that a number is constant within some context.


1.
Back when complex numbers were new (nope, that was not in ancient Greece, but more like renaissance Europe or shortly before), mathematicians (theoretical physicists, actually) were not yet sure about the best concept. Some thought that only the "imaginary unit", i.e. the square root of -1, was really new. They were happily writing sums of the form "a + b*i" (where i is shorthand for square root of minus one) and kept using the algebraic rules for real numbers.

Some other faction of mathematicians noticed that one could "hide" most occurrences of i by substituting "z := a + b*i" and then handling the placeholder z with only one or two additional rules. In other words, it was a decision between two minor inconveniences: either you had to drag around several extra "i" symbols, or you had to add a small number of algebraic rules.

2.
So why the letters a, b, and z? The true reason for a and b has not been traded on through history, but chances are they were picked because they are simply the first two letters of the alphabet, and mathematicians often start there just for convenience.

With z, it was a bit of a different story. The last letter of the alphabet also happens to be the first letter of the German word "Zahl" which means "number" in English. The two factions of differing notation that I mentioned earlier were, simply speaking, disciples of different influential mathematicians of their time. The ones who favoured the idea that complex numbers should be regarded as standalone units (as opposed to an aggregate of two real numbers and the imaginary unit) were educated in the tradition of German mathematicians, and so they picked z to signify that a complex number is one single "Zahl", i.e. a single number.

3.
Finally we get to "+ c". Initially, Mandelbrot studied Julia sets, which are based on the known "z_n+1 := z_n + c" formula. But with Julia sets, the value for c is constant for any given set. It is a relatively common convention among mathematicians to use the letter "c" or "k" for a number that is constant within some context (but does vary in a bigger picture).

4.
With the Mandelbrot set, the value of c isn't actually constant. But Mandelbrot hat written down many results from his research into Julia sets. In mathematical papers, you don't change notations on a whim - you don't want to confuse the readers. So the existing body of Mandelbrot's work was setting a precedent.



So, summing up: Mandelbrot was probably following professional habits when he picked a formal notation for the iteration of the Mandelbrot set. There is no special design or enlightenment to this particular formula. However, people with education in higher math will recognize a detail or two (even the "bug" with c not actually being a constant :-).
Logged
Chillheimer
Global Moderator
Fractal Schemer
******
Posts: 972


Just another fractal being floating by..


chilli.chillheimer chillheimer
WWW
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2016, 12:30:10 AM »

Thank you hobold. Worthy answer for an encyclopedia..  smiley


Anyways, I think it's obvious that we should agree to use this in the future:
fieryfiery² +  angel
Logged

--- Fractals - add some Chaos to your life and put the world in order. ---
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.137 seconds with 23 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.008s, 2q)