|
Rathinagiri
|
 |
« Reply #75 on: July 04, 2010, 06:46:29 PM » |
|
Fractal Higher resolution from here. Anaglyph version. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
cKleinhuis
|
|
« Reply #76 on: July 04, 2010, 08:01:51 PM » |
|
i cannot achieva that parralel method ... i tried, but it is impossible for me ... crosseyed images i sometimes manage to view, but the parrallels are making me crazy, i do not have to cross eyes ?! ? but how to look through the screen without crossing eyes ?!? ! and that anaglyph versions would be gread if i had red/green lenses, but i only have cyan/magenta  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
---
divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
|
|
|
|
Rathinagiri
|
|
« Reply #77 on: July 04, 2010, 09:01:26 PM » |
|
Cross eye method is nice. Actually I do see only on cross eye. Parallel is difficult for me.
The tri-tiled picture is having Left-Right-Left (shortly LRL) images, there by both parallel viewing and cross eye viewing people can see the image. Parallel eye viewing persons should see the first two images (that is Left and Right in that order) and Cross eye viewing persons should see the second and third images (that is Right and Left in that order).
Practice cross eye and you can enjoy 3D in real sense.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
cKleinhuis
|
|
« Reply #78 on: July 04, 2010, 10:52:26 PM » |
|
i see, thank you for information
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
---
divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
|
|
|
Jesse
Download Section
Fractal Schemer
Posts: 1013
|
|
« Reply #79 on: July 05, 2010, 02:02:50 PM » |
|
The one that worked for me is to use 2 lenses that allow you to go nearer to the screen while seeing sharp, and use the parallel method  Maybe strong reading glasses will do it. Edit: Of course, this can only work on small images where its distance matches the eye distance. On bigger images you had to use such an instrument like they had in the beginning of photography that uses mirrors or prism... |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 06, 2010, 05:50:19 PM by Jesse »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rathinagiri
|
|
« Reply #80 on: July 05, 2010, 03:16:57 PM » |
|
That's a new method. Thanks Jesse. I would try!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rathinagiri
|
|
« Reply #82 on: July 06, 2010, 03:37:32 PM » |
|
Fractal Higher resolution from here. Hurray! I have become an Iterator.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 06, 2010, 05:09:09 PM by Rathinagiri »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rathinagiri
|
|
« Reply #85 on: July 10, 2010, 11:11:16 AM » |
|
Inside a golden pyramid?! Fractal Higher resolution from here. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
M Benesi
|
|
« Reply #86 on: July 10, 2010, 10:05:30 PM » |
|
Rathinagirl,
What type of fractal is reply 84 (above "Inside a golden pyramid?!")?
Looks cool.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pauldelbrot
|
|
« Reply #87 on: July 11, 2010, 12:43:41 AM » |
|
If I had to hazard a guess, I'd say 3D IFS or a close relative.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rathinagiri
|
|
« Reply #88 on: July 11, 2010, 06:39:19 AM » |
|
Rathinagirl,
What type of fractal is reply 84 (above "Inside a golden pyramid?!")?
Looks cool.
Thanks for asking. It is created using Menger3 (scale 3) + _translate + _rotate formula in Mandelbulb3D software. I always attach the link to the parameter file along with the image, so that anybody wants can create his own. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
M Benesi
|
|
« Reply #89 on: July 13, 2010, 03:35:46 AM » |
|
thanks! I noticed the link text, never bothered to check it.  Nice one. Once, I made a pseudo-Menger sponge that had a sponge, inside a sponge, inside a sponge (the center had the whole sponge in it, as did its center, etc..) by setting a check value too low in a formula. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
April 26, 2010, 10:46:38 PM
Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM