Logo by Fiery - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Did you know ? you can use LaTex inside Postings on fractalforums.com!
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. April 25, 2024, 09:18:39 AM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: Set which contains every possible image..  (Read 10481 times)
Description: see title
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tglad
Fractal Molossus
**
Posts: 703


WWW
« Reply #30 on: October 12, 2012, 08:14:38 AM »

Quote
we could go through every possible combination of images for a 640x480 256 color image relatively quickly.
that's 256^(640*480) which at 60 fps would take 10^307181 times the known age of the universe
Logged
taurus
Fractal Supremo
*****
Posts: 1175



profile.php?id=1339106810 @taurus_arts_66
WWW
« Reply #31 on: October 12, 2012, 08:59:11 AM »

that's 256^(640*480) which at 60 fps would take 10^307181 times the known age of the universe

 rolling on floor laughing
Logged

when life offers you a lemon, get yourself some salt and tequila!
puntopunto
Alien
***
Posts: 28

keep it simple


« Reply #32 on: October 30, 2012, 10:51:02 AM »

Quote
  If we wrote something that went through all of the possible screens, we could go through every possible combination of images for a 640x480 256 color image relatively quickly.

  At 60 frames a second, an hour a day, it would take ~364.09 days to watch every conceivable permutation.

Certainly far from correct.

Quote
that's 256^(640*480) which at 60 fps would take 10^307181 times the known age of the universe

Correct

It seems that "a reasonable notion about possibilities" often don't exist. So let do some calculations:
Take a really tiny screen, a screen of 2x2 pixels and 256 colours. How many pictures can you make. That is 256x256x256x256=
1887442560 pictures. Now how many pictures can you see in 364.09 days at a rate of 60 frames a second: 60x60x60x24x364.09=
4294967296 . Dividing gives 4294967296 /1887442560=2.27555. So even to see all possible pictures on that tiny,tiny screen takes more then 2 years.
If we go on to a 3x3 pixel screen and do the same calculations then you see that you need already more then 1000 000 000 000 years.
The correct number, about 10^307181 years, for a screen 640x480 pixels is beyond every imagination. Even if we imagine 10 000 000 000 people on our planet and that there are 10 000 000 000 'earth planets' and they all are watching during 10 000 000 000 years, even then they only have seen 0, and then 307181-30 zeros followed by one 1, part of all possible screens. That is to say the best imagination I can give:"all those people, during all that time has seen nothing, nichts, rien, nada, niente" from all the possibiliies.


 

 

 
Logged
matsoljare
Fractal Lover
**
Posts: 215



WWW
« Reply #33 on: October 30, 2012, 06:31:43 PM »

A two dimensional equivalent of the De Brujin sequence would be a challenge to come up with....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Bruijn_sequence
Logged
quick-dudley
Forums Newbie
*
Posts: 7



« Reply #34 on: November 07, 2012, 06:37:27 AM »

A two dimensional equivalent of the De Brujin sequence would be a challenge to come up with....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Bruijn_sequence

You mean a De Brujin torus?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Bruijn_torus

Some have been found but it's not known whether one exists for every set of "lengths"
Logged
M Benesi
Fractal Schemer
****
Posts: 1075



WWW
« Reply #35 on: November 08, 2012, 07:26:54 AM »

  Whoops.  cheesy
Logged

Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
The best image ever Images Showcase (Rate My Fractal) DarkBeam 5 1935 Last post January 24, 2012, 03:54:37 PM
by DarkBeam
2-D FractInt image looks like 3-D image FractInt Gallery simon.snake 8 2394 Last post March 13, 2012, 12:47:57 AM
by David Makin
Deepest known image Mandelbrot & Julia Set « 1 2 » LesPaul 27 8593 Last post May 10, 2013, 09:27:50 AM
by grobblewobble
Image convolution General Discussion matsoljare 14 3230 Last post March 29, 2014, 10:34:02 AM
by kram1032
new image by stefano (ziegfrid) Images Showcase (Rate My Fractal) cKleinhuis 1 749 Last post April 22, 2013, 04:59:13 AM
by zonepatcher

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.148 seconds with 24 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.008s, 2q)