Logo by wmauzey - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Follow us on Twitter
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. March 28, 2024, 10:22:20 AM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: fractal solar panels for higher effiiciency?  (Read 4896 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
woodlands
Guest
« on: January 21, 2007, 07:11:49 AM »

So heres an idea (I wish I could make money on it, but even credit for the idea would be nice smiley

Seems to me that the problem with solar panel efficiency is that there is a huge distance the photoelectric electron has to travel to reach a conductor, thus losing energy as it has to battle through the semiconductor.  I never understood the simple line patterns they use on the conductors...as if they are maximizing semiconductor surface for the most photovoltaic electrons, but in doing so they lose on the energy efficiency.

What if instead of the simple metal lines, they sputtered a metal pattern based on some of the more filigreed areas of the Mandelbrot set?  By some proof, didnt someone prove that the set is connected?  Couldnt you choose your iteration value to some appropriate value to make enough filigree to provide a large surface area, but with metal conductors very close by to almost all areas of semiconductor?  Wouldnt you think that could raise efficiency?

Any ideas on how to pursue this beyond casual thinking?



Logged
doncasteel8587
Guest
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2007, 02:09:58 AM »

Yes, what your saying makes a lot of sense, but I would think a more efficient pattern than the Mandelbrot set would be branching type fractal patterns like in leaves or blood vessels.
Logged
lycium
Fractal Supremo
*****
Posts: 1158



WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2007, 04:43:00 AM »

i've read about fractal antennae before, relevant?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_antenna
http://local.wasp.uwa.edu.au/~pbourke/fractals/gasket/
Logged

heneganj
Guest
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2007, 08:53:18 PM »

Something like this?

Logged
Duncan C
Fractal Fanatic
****
Posts: 348



WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2007, 02:07:19 AM »

So heres an idea (I wish I could make money on it, but even credit for the idea would be nice smiley

Seems to me that the problem with solar panel efficiency is that there is a huge distance the photoelectric electron has to travel to reach a conductor, thus losing energy as it has to battle through the semiconductor.  I never understood the simple line patterns they use on the conductors...as if they are maximizing semiconductor surface for the most photovoltaic electrons, but in doing so they lose on the energy efficiency.

What if instead of the simple metal lines, they sputtered a metal pattern based on some of the more filigreed areas of the Mandelbrot set?  By some proof, didnt someone prove that the set is connected?  Couldnt you choose your iteration value to some appropriate value to make enough filigree to provide a large surface area, but with metal conductors very close by to almost all areas of semiconductor?  Wouldnt you think that could raise efficiency?

Any ideas on how to pursue this beyond casual thinking?





Indeed. A fractal shaped solar collector is called a tree.  wink

Seems like manufacturing would be the real challenge here.

Don't photovoltaic cells have conductors along the back, in addition to the semiconductor.


Duncan C
Logged

Regards,

Duncan C
lycium
Fractal Supremo
*****
Posts: 1158



WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2007, 02:13:09 AM »

hehehe smiley
Logged

twinbee
Fractal Fertilizer
*****
Posts: 383



WWW
« Reply #6 on: April 07, 2008, 12:45:53 AM »

Also see: http://www.inl.gov/featurestories/2007-12-17.shtml
Logged
tazcr4zy
Guest
« Reply #7 on: August 19, 2009, 11:58:33 PM »

Maybe u can utilize the surface area of aerogel to house a nano-engineered fractal structure...?
i recently saw a special on pbs about fractals and its so fascinating. Mandel...whatever seems to have given efficiency a concrete formula. afro
Logged
Saquedon
Conqueror
*******
Posts: 108



saquedon Saquedon saquedon
WWW
« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2009, 01:53:48 AM »

The main problem with solar panels is: how can you make them cheap ?

While fractal pattern do show an advantage at radiowavelengths and it is also affordable to make those, light works on much smaller wavelengths and to operate at that wavelength you end up at the Nanoscale. While currently research is undergoing to use these technologies for trying to make things invisible (cloaking) it can also ofcourse work the the way round when we try to capture the light. The company working on the cloaking technology is calling these materials used for cloaking "Fractal Metamaterials".

The only problem is nanoscale "fractal Metamaterials" are still way to expensive to be used in solar panels.
Some day (soon) perhaps but definatly not today.

You can read more about this on my blog here:
http://fractuality.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/fractal-antennas-fractal-metamaterials/

Logged

kram1032
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 1863


« Reply #9 on: December 08, 2009, 02:18:51 AM »

those crazy mats of  -1 < IoR < 1?
nice cheesy

though, mats of IoR < 0 also are cool... smiley

woodlands:
increasing the surface would add folds. Folds would add self-shadowing parts. Self-shadowing parts would minimize efficiency. - My guess is, that the benefit and the miss in that case would be similar...
though, line like structures as suggested here (or even better, meta-mats cheesy) might work just fine smiley
Logged
Bob Walsh
Guest
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2009, 01:12:19 PM »

Fractal nanostructured titania thin films of low roughness, high complexity, and relatively broad particle distribution have been developed by condensation of titanium butoxide in an ethyl cellulose (EC) polymer matrix, the process being induced by alcoholysis in the absence of water.


http://www.techstore.ie/Renewable-Energy/Solar-Energy/Solar-Panels.html
Logged
Saquedon
Conqueror
*******
Posts: 108



saquedon Saquedon saquedon
WWW
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2009, 06:47:00 AM »

Well the term nano is widely overused as a marketing ploy, i doubt those mentioned solar panels are the result of what can be considered a real nanoproduction process.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
query on fractal mathematics and solar panel configurations General Discussion bill 0 1982 Last post August 21, 2009, 08:03:23 AM
by bill
If the universe is a fractal of complexity higher than the M set Philosophy M Benesi 4 2297 Last post September 16, 2010, 05:48:54 AM
by M Benesi
A Solar Chariot for the young Lady Mandelbulb3D Gallery PhotoComix 1 683 Last post May 01, 2012, 02:21:04 AM
by kameelian
fractal on five cloth panels... Images Showcase (Rate My Fractal) thom 1 1001 Last post February 07, 2016, 08:25:53 AM
by Michael Scharrer

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.203 seconds with 24 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.008s, 2q)