Logo by Cyclops - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Support us via Flattr FLATTR Link
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. April 20, 2024, 03:54:27 AM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: New fractal.. needs a name  (Read 4420 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tglad
Fractal Molossus
**
Posts: 703


WWW
« Reply #15 on: November 28, 2012, 01:44:28 PM »

Thanks Syntopia, useful info.
Here you can see the surface with height of -0.25 up to 1:


It really explodes out like a volcano when height increases past 1, so I think I'll call it a volcanic surface fractal.
Around 1.75 the fractal occupies all of space and has a Hausdorff dimension of infinity!
Logged
cKleinhuis
Administrator
Fractal Senior
*******
Posts: 7044


formerly known as 'Trifox'


WWW
« Reply #16 on: November 28, 2012, 02:11:01 PM »

infinite hausdorff dimension ? please elaborate!
Logged

---

divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
DarkBeam
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2512


Fragments of the fractal -like the tip of it


« Reply #17 on: November 28, 2012, 05:21:23 PM »

Works - managed to disable that ANGLE! lips are sealed
Logged

No sweat, guardian of wisdom!
kram1032
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 1863


« Reply #18 on: November 28, 2012, 09:56:43 PM »

There's mathematically no way it could have a Hausdorff dimension above 3. - unless you embed the entire thing in higher-dimensional space. - particularly in infinite-dimensional one.
Besides that, it's really nice stuff.

If you somehow calculate the Hausdorff Dimension with some sort of algorithm and you get infinity, that's either because of numerical instabilities or your algorithm is wrong.
Logged
Tglad
Fractal Molossus
**
Posts: 703


WWW
« Reply #19 on: November 28, 2012, 11:05:22 PM »

It is because there is overlap (for height > 0.55), so some points in space have double cover, or triple cover etc. You can do the same thing with the Levy C curve, for 90 degree bend angle it has Hausdorff dimension 2 (log(2) / log(sqrt(2))), for bend angle > 90 degree it is log(2)/log( < sqrt(2) ) so the dimension is > 2.
If you don't allow multi-cover of the space then the max Hausdorff dimension is the dimension of the space.

Here's a higher res of above image:
Logged
kram1032
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 1863


« Reply #20 on: November 29, 2012, 12:10:56 AM »

ah, so multiple-covering counts for adding dimensions. That sort of makes sense. It's like you need more space than you actually have, so you multi-cover to get there.
Logged
cKleinhuis
Administrator
Fractal Senior
*******
Posts: 7044


formerly known as 'Trifox'


WWW
« Reply #21 on: November 29, 2012, 12:56:18 AM »

i get this, but in my eyes it is not really special, because such curves exists ... basically the trivial curve with no movement ... the dot at the center of the c oordinate system would have as well unlimited hausdorff dimension

this brings us to the space filling curves and why it is such a good name wink but as far as i know the definition of space filling curves is NOT limited to the topografical dimension !?
Logged

---

divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
Tglad
Fractal Molossus
**
Posts: 703


WWW
« Reply #22 on: November 29, 2012, 09:45:51 AM »

I agree, higher dimension from overlap is a bit meaningless. If we don't allow multi-cover of the space then this fractal goes from 2d and approaches 3d as height goes from 0 to about 1.75. We'd also have to accept that Levy C curve has Hausdorff dimension a little less than 2.

Here are the first 3 iterations if you hadn't guessed:
Logged
kram1032
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 1863


« Reply #23 on: November 29, 2012, 11:32:16 AM »

that iteration looks pretty wild. nice.
Logged
Tglad
Fractal Molossus
**
Posts: 703


WWW
« Reply #24 on: December 01, 2012, 01:39:05 AM »

Here's a variation, you reverse the face normal of the 6 sub-triangles, it gives a shape that looks the same from both sides of the surface:



So is a bit like how the Koch curve differs from the Levy C curve.
The pics are the largest height without self intersection, about 0.35.

Here's a challenge that is open to everyone... 
ready?...

is there a fractal like this that doesn't self-intersect but folds up into a space-filling surface like the Von Koch curve does?
Logged
Tglad
Fractal Molossus
**
Posts: 703


WWW
« Reply #25 on: December 11, 2012, 11:16:14 PM »

There's an interesting critical point, when the height is 0.55209 then all the triangles are isosceles. This is also about the point where the shape is at its most rough without self-intersecting. I'm not sure if those two are exactly the same point but they could well be.


* surface055.png (104.01 KB, 355x320 - viewed 536 times.)
Logged
kram1032
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 1863


« Reply #26 on: December 12, 2012, 12:48:51 AM »

it's pretty likely that they are.
Would be a strange rare math stunt if they weren't.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.283 seconds with 24 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.008s, 2q)