bib
|
|
« on: January 15, 2010, 10:01:02 PM » |
|
Don't know if this is really a Mandelbulb rendering, and obviously, you'll see much more 2D than 3D, but I like this fractal alot :
http://www.youtube.com/v/O9BgtW-qFvw&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1
|
|
|
Logged
|
Between order and disorder reigns a delicious moment. (Paul Valéry)
|
|
|
mrrgu
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2010, 10:05:02 PM » |
|
Like it.. I think 2D is usually more beautiful than 3D.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cKleinhuis
|
|
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2010, 11:56:01 PM » |
|
mooooooore, loooooooooooooongeeeeeer, deeeeeeeeeeepeeeeeeer! excellent! love the zoom
|
|
|
Logged
|
---
divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
|
|
|
cKleinhuis
|
|
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2010, 11:57:43 PM » |
|
was it that fractal with the mandelbrot in the x/z plane ? love those tree structures built in !
at the end the animation of the 3d object could be slooooooooooooower!
well done! hectic!
so, what did you use to render ?!?!
|
|
« Last Edit: January 16, 2010, 12:01:46 AM by Trifox »
|
Logged
|
---
divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
|
|
|
bib
|
|
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2010, 01:57:12 AM » |
|
Yes it is this fractal, rendered in Ultrafractal. It's really fun to explore, because there are strong similarities with the way the Mandelbrot set is structured, but also a lot of differences.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Between order and disorder reigns a delicious moment. (Paul Valéry)
|
|
|
cKleinhuis
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2010, 02:02:54 AM » |
|
lol, i am wondering the whole time why no one rotates it 90 degrees around the x axis eh voila we have a nice mandelbrot 3d candidate,what was the formula modification ? and what the heck uf formula you used ? i can not get my uf5 ready to render a nice deeeeep anim, how do you control camera pathes ?!
|
|
|
Logged
|
---
divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
|
|
|
bib
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2010, 02:11:50 AM » |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 16, 2010, 02:13:33 AM by bib »
|
Logged
|
Between order and disorder reigns a delicious moment. (Paul Valéry)
|
|
|
kram1032
|
|
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2010, 07:20:55 PM » |
|
a great vid and very nice quater-cut of the mbulb
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bib
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2010, 08:51:52 PM » |
|
mooooooore, loooooooooooooongeeeeeer, deeeeeeeeeeepeeeeeeer!
I will first post some images
|
|
|
Logged
|
Between order and disorder reigns a delicious moment. (Paul Valéry)
|
|
|
kram1032
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 17, 2010, 08:59:14 PM » |
|
oh my.... where did you find that one? Looks great
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cKleinhuis
|
|
« Reply #10 on: January 17, 2010, 10:42:05 PM » |
|
indeed,awesome maya style picture !
|
|
|
Logged
|
---
divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
|
|
|
bib
|
|
« Reply #11 on: January 17, 2010, 11:06:54 PM » |
|
oh my.... where did you find that one? somewhere quite deep near the border of the perpendicular Mandelbrot Another one, in another area:
|
|
|
Logged
|
Between order and disorder reigns a delicious moment. (Paul Valéry)
|
|
|
bib
|
|
« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2010, 11:10:04 PM » |
|
There was a post where someone asked if several large minibrots could be seen together in a single view. It seems that this phenomenon occurs a lot more frequently in the perpendicular Mandelbrot:
|
|
|
Logged
|
Between order and disorder reigns a delicious moment. (Paul Valéry)
|
|
|
bib
|
|
« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2010, 11:19:49 PM » |
|
Another minibrot in shape of a Concorde, surrounded by crowns of flowers. Symmetry plays in this fractal a different role than in the Mandelbrot set. Anyone has the 2D equation for this fractal? Come on, it's easy!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Between order and disorder reigns a delicious moment. (Paul Valéry)
|
|
|
kram1032
|
|
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2010, 11:34:30 PM » |
|
Did I get that last part right? You're operating in complex numbers (or at least really directly in 2D) for those? If that's the case, it shouldn't be too hard to do deep zooms of plane sections if the standard m-set formula and this one get generalized if the formula is r^n | phi*n | theta*n, the 2D-version should basically be where phi = 0 rather than theta... Does that colouring relate to the 3D-structure directly or is the 3D-effect archeived in a different way?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|