Logo by jwm-art - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Support us via Flattr FLATTR Link
 
Home Help Search Gallery Downloads Login Register
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. February 02, 2023, 07:17:10 PM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Welcome to Fractal Forums > Fractal Math, Chaos Theory & Research > Mandelbrot & Julia Set > The 3D Mandelbulb > Mandelbulb Renderings > Mandelbulb voxel representation @ 2000^3 voxels
Pages: [1]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: Mandelbulb voxel representation @ 2000^3 voxels  (Read 2349 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
twinbee
Fractal Fertilizer
*****
Posts: 383



WWW
« on: November 28, 2009, 10:30:35 PM »
For anyone else who's interested in making plastic/metal/carbon buckyball models, and needs a voxel representation, I thought I'd upload the 2000x2000x2000 voxel data for the power 8 Mandelbulb (6 iterations, 'cosine' variation).

The 28 meg zip file below consists of two thousand 1-bit (black & white) PNG files (each @ 2000x2000 pixels).

Download.

I make no promises regarding the fragility or spikiness of this object, so handle with care wink
« Last Edit: November 28, 2009, 10:34:56 PM by twinbee » Logged
cbuchner1
Fractal Phenom
******
Posts: 443
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2009, 11:04:43 PM »

wow, this certainly compresses well. How many iterations were used in generating this set?

Have you thought about using a non-graphical representation, say, 1 bit per voxel, scanned in x,y,z order?
This would lead to a minimal uncompressed file size (i.e. 2000ˆ3 bits)

Christian
Logged
twinbee
Fractal Fertilizer
*****
Posts: 383



WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2009, 11:33:10 PM »
Yes, a single file voxel cube array would compress even better (because the info is compressed all around). I'm guessing around 3 megabyte even. Uncompressed though and we're talking 1 GB! smiley

I used PNGs mainly to make things more manageable (and because it's a popular format).

It uses 6 iterations. Maybe 5 is more sensible...
« Last Edit: November 28, 2009, 11:40:32 PM by twinbee » Logged
twinbee
Fractal Fertilizer
*****
Posts: 383



WWW
« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2009, 11:56:27 PM »
Oh just to add, if I understand correctly, I think a 6-sided depth map would be an interesting approach, and certainly good in terms of file size. Six 12-bit colour PNGs worth it would be, though the inside and possibly certain details on the outside won't be captured.
« Last Edit: November 28, 2009, 11:59:30 PM by twinbee » Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
GigaBroccoli: Real time Mandelbulb into a sparse voxel octree Videos CyrilCrassin 6 3826 Last post March 11, 2010, 09:37:47 PM
by LeonardC
Point cloud and voxels system - real time unlimited detail General Discussion o0megaZer0o 3 7533 Last post March 01, 2011, 09:23:06 PM
by o0megaZer0o
Slices 2 - Mandelbulb 3D voxel stack animation Movies Showcase (Rate My Movie) Don Whitaker 1 2053 Last post September 06, 2012, 08:43:50 AM
by art.cjbarnaby.com
Power cosmic 2000 Kalles Fraktaler Gallery TheRedshiftRider 5 973 Last post June 21, 2015, 06:03:34 PM
by TheRedshiftRider
Suggestions for a renderer to explore a 3D density function (voxels) 3D Fractal Generation snickell 3 1027 Last post July 09, 2016, 09:55:38 AM
by 3dickulus

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.19 seconds with 29 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.013s, 2q)