ziegfrid
Forums Newbie
Posts: 5
|
|
« Reply #30 on: April 19, 2011, 04:02:33 PM » |
|
34.6 seconds
Core2Quad Q6600 @2,4GHz, 4GB ram
|
|
|
Logged
|
-------------------------------------------------------------- This is impossible! - said the Reason. This is desperate! - noticed the Experience. This is useless! - cut the Pride. Just try... - whispered the Dream.
|
|
|
kameelian
Iterator
Posts: 181
|
|
« Reply #31 on: August 02, 2011, 06:20:32 PM » |
|
for what it's worth, this late on
i3 M 350 @ 2.27 GHz, (twin core/2threads per core), 3GB RAM, Win7 Home Pre, 32bit. general laptop. = 46.3secs plus 1.2 for shadow. i7 2600k 3.4 GHz [OCd to 4.4 GHz] (4 core/2threads per core), 8GB RAM, Win7 Home Pre, 64bit. Renderer Only. = 9secs plus .1 for shadow. Kam
|
|
« Last Edit: August 02, 2011, 06:23:50 PM by kameelian, Reason: typo »
|
Logged
|
Mandelbulb3D - Like Christmas Every morning
|
|
|
ant123
Guest
|
|
« Reply #32 on: September 04, 2011, 11:23:27 PM » |
|
thanks Kameelian, it's logged.
that is realy fast.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kameelian
Iterator
Posts: 181
|
|
« Reply #33 on: September 05, 2011, 10:11:04 AM » |
|
Hi,
Hah, yeah, I suppose it is quite fast (compared to some).
But it is still really slow - waiting, waiting.
cheers Kam
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mandelbulb3D - Like Christmas Every morning
|
|
|
cKleinhuis
|
|
« Reply #34 on: October 09, 2013, 08:44:18 AM » |
|
i7 4770k 3,5 ghz - ~11 Seconds (damn, i love that machine!)
|
|
|
Logged
|
---
divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
|
|
|
Stonevoice
Forums Freshman
Posts: 12
|
|
« Reply #35 on: October 15, 2013, 07:23:43 PM » |
|
It took me 3:57. My computer is nine years old, with an AMD Athlon 3000+ proc with 1.43 GB Ram. You guys are lucky!
My computer also won't let me run any formulas with dIFS in them, because of the graphics card.
|
|
« Last Edit: October 15, 2013, 07:29:38 PM by Stonevoice »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cKleinhuis
|
|
« Reply #36 on: October 15, 2013, 07:38:44 PM » |
|
that is an really old computer but for your difs problem i can help you you cannot combine difs with "normal" functions, you find compiler messages in the main window below the tab area, you can just combine difs formulas with other difs functions mb3d is in no way using a gpu!
|
|
|
Logged
|
---
divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
|
|
|
Stonevoice
Forums Freshman
Posts: 12
|
|
« Reply #37 on: October 15, 2013, 07:54:03 PM » |
|
Thanks, cKleinhuas, but I cannot run dIFS the 'right' way either -in other words, just dIFS combined with dIFS. The formula box does not even show the 'dIFS' headings at among the formula suggestions. The list ends with the 'Ads' column. If I try to run someone esles params that use dIFS, I get an error message saying that the processor does not have the right instruction set to run those formulas. I also have a laptop that is about as old, and it CAN run dIFS - I guess it has different CPU or GPU in it. oh well, getting a new computer in a week with i7 3.5 mHz with 8 GB RAM, so things will change. I hope I can run MB3D on 64 bit system...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cKleinhuis
|
|
« Reply #38 on: October 15, 2013, 08:16:57 PM » |
|
it will work perfectly on that the cpu might be really missing some features that darkbeam hacked into those formulas @darkbeam, no offence you are doing a fantastic job!
|
|
|
Logged
|
---
divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
|
|
|
DarkBeam
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
Posts: 2512
Fragments of the fractal -like the tip of it
|
|
« Reply #39 on: October 18, 2013, 04:54:55 PM » |
|
Not really - I just use a few of the oldest CPU features. Just floating point routines... And some xor/and/jg that were also in z80 machines I think
|
|
|
Logged
|
No sweat, guardian of wisdom!
|
|
|
fractalgee
Forums Newbie
Posts: 7
|
|
« Reply #40 on: July 23, 2015, 04:48:40 PM » |
|
Dual quad core Xeon Mac Pro @2.33GHz
14.5 seconds including ambient shadows calc
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
xahhax
Forums Newbie
Posts: 7
|
|
« Reply #41 on: January 23, 2016, 01:19:28 PM » |
|
2015 iMac 5K Skylake: 0:09.1
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AtomicNixon
Forums Newbie
Posts: 7
|
|
« Reply #42 on: November 28, 2017, 04:03:28 AM » |
|
Threadripper 1950x at 4.1 Ghz. Two point eight seconds. I win!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hobold
Fractal Bachius
Posts: 573
|
|
« Reply #43 on: November 28, 2017, 01:31:06 PM » |
|
Threadripper 1950x at 4.1 Ghz. Two point eight seconds. I win! The name "AMD Ryzen Threadripper" is pretty much the only downside of that monster . Even the price looks good if you compare to Intel - especially if you want to use ECC RAM to help with system stability for those week long renders (support for ECC RAM requires even more expensive Xeons on the Intel side of the fence). Performance is very competitive for anything but AVX code, and even there AMD ain't bad. (Disclaimer: I am now officially an AMD fanboy, since I built a personal supercomputer based on threadripper. Not overclocking, though; I went for reliability and low noise on air cooling.) Competition is a good thing. Nice to have it back.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AtomicNixon
Forums Newbie
Posts: 7
|
|
« Reply #44 on: December 10, 2017, 09:44:52 PM » |
|
The name "AMD Ryzen Threadripper" is pretty much the only downside of that monster . Even the price looks good if you compare to Intel - especially if you want to use ECC RAM to help with system stability for those week long renders (support for ECC RAM requires even more expensive Xeons on the Intel side of the fence). Performance is very competitive for anything but AVX code, and even there AMD ain't bad. (Disclaimer: I am now officially an AMD fanboy, since I built a personal supercomputer based on threadripper. Not overclocking, though; I went for reliability and low noise on air cooling.) Competition is a good thing. Nice to have it back. Thanks! And congrats on the new machine! If you want to use all of it, go for the Enermax full block cover cooler. I'm using the 360mm model and can add my voice to others in testifying that it's the single best cooler on the market by a wide margin. Full coverage on the package counts for about 10 degrees C which makes sense given that the dies are situated in the corners. Most coolers are still trying to cover a square with a circle, not good.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|