dainbramage
Iterator
Posts: 165
|
|
« Reply #15 on: February 25, 2011, 01:01:11 AM » |
|
My system is the same or similar to bib's, took 19.5 seconds.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mrcharles
Forums Newbie
Posts: 6
|
|
« Reply #16 on: February 25, 2011, 05:34:11 AM » |
|
22.5 sec. for total render (incl. shadows)
dell 690 workstation dual quad xeon 2.0 Ghz, win7/64
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ker2x
Fractal Molossus
Posts: 795
|
|
« Reply #17 on: February 25, 2011, 09:48:46 AM » |
|
how to load the benchmark please ? Edit : Oops ! It's not mandelbulber
|
|
« Last Edit: February 25, 2011, 09:50:51 AM by ker2x »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KRAFTWERK
|
|
« Reply #18 on: February 25, 2011, 12:31:17 PM » |
|
49.2 seconds on a MacBook Pro (2.53 GHz Intel Core i5) under Parallels running XP... I have to get a new puter!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ker2x
Fractal Molossus
Posts: 795
|
|
« Reply #19 on: February 25, 2011, 01:37:16 PM » |
|
25.7s on my laptop with wine on linux (ubuntu 64bits) CPU : I7 740-QM @ 1.73GHz http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=49024(4 Core, 8 Threads, Max Turbo Frequency : 2.93 Ghz)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
haltenny
|
|
« Reply #20 on: February 25, 2011, 04:12:20 PM » |
|
26.6 seconds on AMD Phenom II 965... (3.4gh)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cytotox
|
|
« Reply #21 on: February 25, 2011, 06:05:26 PM » |
|
48 sec
Intel Core 2 CPU E8400 @ 3.00 GHz, 8 Gb RAM Windows Vista 64 Bit, SP2
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ant123
Guest
|
|
« Reply #22 on: February 26, 2011, 04:17:19 PM » |
|
Thanks for all the replies! i have written them in the results at the top! Moor's law says that the speed should be 10 times faster every 60 months / 5-6 years! On my Offline Computer Computer (Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @2.4GHz, 2.39 GHz) EDIT - Oh yeah, NVidia GeForce 8800 GTS) :
Main Render; 48 Seconds Ambient Shadows; About 2 Seconds Hard Shadows; 13 Seconds
Total : About 1 Minute 3 Seconds
that is abotu as fast as me on my c2 duo 2.0 ghz, either there was another process running or it was only on 2 cores.
|
|
« Last Edit: February 26, 2011, 04:31:39 PM by ant123 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ant123
Guest
|
|
« Reply #23 on: March 12, 2011, 07:27:59 PM » |
|
I don't think relative results in Mandelbulb 3D or Mandelbulber will deviate very much from the above, the phenom 3.4/i7 920 gets 26/19 on this parameter and 19/13 on the other test, i dont know if it does the same on all parameters, else perhaps the phenom ii has extra cash and sse instructions compared to the athlon ii to make it 20+ % better at these maths.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
skyzyk
Alien
Posts: 26
Aspire to Inspire, before you expire.
|
|
« Reply #24 on: March 13, 2011, 03:18:11 AM » |
|
38.6 Seconds
Intel i7-860, Quad Duo Core, 2,8MHz
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Don Whitaker
|
|
« Reply #25 on: March 13, 2011, 04:10:50 AM » |
|
about 38 seconds Processor: AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core , 2500 Mhz Windows 7 32 bit, 3 GB RAM I've been scheming ways to afford a system just for rendering It's nice to have some rough estimates of the boost I'd get from upgrading.
|
|
« Last Edit: March 13, 2011, 04:13:34 AM by Don Whitaker »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mario837
Iterator
Posts: 158
mario837
|
|
« Reply #26 on: March 15, 2011, 02:46:55 PM » |
|
Dell studio XPS 9100 with i7 930 @2.80GHz and 4.0Gb RAM = 17.6 seconds
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Xenodimensional
|
|
« Reply #28 on: April 11, 2011, 02:49:17 PM » |
|
6.5 seconds dual xeon x5650 24GB ram
|
|
|
Logged
|
causality ignores the persecutory illusions of free will
|
|
|
heavenriver
Guest
|
|
« Reply #29 on: April 11, 2011, 04:57:04 PM » |
|
Don't know if you still need benchmarks, but here's mine!
Processor: Intel Core i5 750 @ 2.67 Ghz 4GB DDR3 RAM
Total rendering time: 24.3 seconds
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|