Logo by Transdimensional - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Check out the originating "3d Mandelbulb" thread here
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. November 29, 2022, 10:24:28 PM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: The negative side of being positive  (Read 544 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
mclarekin
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 1739



« on: September 04, 2014, 06:55:55 AM »

The negative side of being positive



http://www.fractalforums.com/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view;id=16598

positive scale mbox with negative C for a change
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
What is the largest positive real value inside the complex Mandelbrot Set ? Programming David Makin 9 5180 Last post February 20, 2010, 06:04:58 PM
by Timeroot
Negative powers!!! Theory cbuchner1 5 6635 Last post November 21, 2009, 04:46:28 AM
by lycium
negative pow. bulb-box mix Images Showcase (Rate My Fractal) visual.bermarte 0 559 Last post April 28, 2010, 08:42:29 PM
by visual.bermarte
Positive Energy Images Showcase (Rate My Fractal) Well En Taoed 0 992 Last post August 13, 2010, 11:24:35 PM
by Well En Taoed
The blue side of the other side Mandelbulb3D Gallery lyron 0 1260 Last post February 19, 2011, 09:07:56 PM
by lyron

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.196 seconds with 29 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.006s, 2q)