http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=i6WxIblKVZIAlways dissatisfied with populist explanations of quantum entanglement . Schroedinger intended his cat to highlight the ridiculousness of superposition of particles . Superposition of waves yes, but particles: no !
So why do we in this age claim particles may be superposed? Because we accept "wave bundles" as particles. And yet we have no clear idea of what wave bundles are.
Even if we accept n aether we can not decide if aether is material, non material or both.
As the physicist pointed out, the " famed" quantum accuracy is an accuracy of probability spread of results, that is akin to saying tha one can set error bounds on a resultant measurement calculation.
So what is quantum ntanglmnt telling us? Omly that there are 2 opposing behaviours to every dynamic measurable behaviour which can not be separated analytically from each other, like a dipole cannot be separated into poles. In fact pole or polarity is a dynamic concept so their existence does not determine their static relationship.
Where a finite wave region exists or is estsbished, the ends of that region may be free or bound. If free the waves have the same amplitude but opposing screws. If bound the waves have opposite amplitudes and opposing screw. This is a basic Quantum entnglment in a wave deformation in a medium .
If the basic aether is a magnetic one then these entanglements are complex trochoidally dynamic surfaces of equipotental pressures in which curvilineal force vectors emerge as defining the equipotential surfaces.
That these may manifest as a cat in superposition is nonsense. Our perception causes any information carried by the waves to be filtered and thus we perceive a filtered view of reality. Our instruments will detect both or all reflecting surfaces of the wave dynamic , but not a live or dead cat!
It is time to kill schroedingers cat in the explanation of quantum probability distributions, and quantum wave interference.