so you basically colour it by a predefined gradient and the values to be used are the difference of true distance estimation and error?
Hmmm.... do you think, you could also try to color the set based on a spherical colour model?
(the center there is either black or white, so the brightness is either radius or inversed radius and the actual colour is given by the sign which gives the ratios of r,g,b...)
basically you start with colouring each point and then you just follow them without changing their specific colour... know what I mean?
So you could more or less graphically see where each point "came from"
Your current colouring technique is great too
> so you basically colour it by a predefined gradient and the values to be used are the difference of true distance estimation and error?
Not really "error", solid on smooth iteration and solid on distance estimate are two truly different methods so using one for "solid" and the other for colouring is not based on an error, just on two different calculations.
Colour by location is an option in the formula that I've not quite sorted yet
I know it's very simple but I find it boring.
When I finally do the class-based versions of the formula you'll essentially be able to colour the object using any available UF colouring.
Thanks
February 25, 2013, 11:08:33 PM
Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM