Logo by kr0mat1k - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Visit the official fractalforums.com Youtube Channel
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. January 24, 2018, 08:54:47 AM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: A processor benchmark for Mandelbulb 3d  (Read 9368 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
ziegfrid
Forums Newbie
*
Posts: 5


WWW
« Reply #30 on: April 19, 2011, 04:02:33 PM »

34.6 seconds

Core2Quad Q6600 @2,4GHz, 4GB ram
Logged

--------------------------------------------------------------
This is impossible! - said the Reason.
This is desperate! - noticed the Experience.
This is useless! - cut the Pride.
Just try... - whispered the Dream.
kameelian
Iterator
*
Posts: 181



« Reply #31 on: August 02, 2011, 06:20:32 PM »

for what it's worth, this late on

i3 M 350 @ 2.27 GHz, (twin core/2threads per core), 3GB RAM, Win7 Home Pre, 32bit. general laptop. = 46.3secs plus 1.2 for shadow.
i7 2600k 3.4 GHz [OCd to 4.4 GHz] (4 core/2threads per core), 8GB RAM, Win7 Home Pre, 64bit. Renderer Only. = 9secs plus .1 for shadow.
Kam
« Last Edit: August 02, 2011, 06:23:50 PM by kameelian, Reason: typo » Logged

Mandelbulb3D - Like Christmas Every morning wink
ant123
Guest
« Reply #32 on: September 04, 2011, 11:23:27 PM »

thanks Kameelian, it's logged.

that is realy fast.
Logged
kameelian
Iterator
*
Posts: 181



« Reply #33 on: September 05, 2011, 10:11:04 AM »

Hi,

Hah, yeah, I suppose it is quite fast (compared to some).

But it is still really slow - waiting, waiting.

cheers
Kam
Logged

Mandelbulb3D - Like Christmas Every morning wink
cKleinhuis
Administrator
Fractal Senior
*******
Posts: 7044


formerly known as 'Trifox'


WWW
« Reply #34 on: October 09, 2013, 08:44:18 AM »

i7 4770k 3,5 ghz - ~11 Seconds cheesy
(damn, i love that machine!)
Logged

---

divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
Stonevoice
Forums Freshman
**
Posts: 12



« Reply #35 on: October 15, 2013, 07:23:43 PM »

It took me 3:57.
My computer is nine years old, with an AMD Athlon 3000+ proc with 1.43 GB Ram.
You guys are lucky!

My computer also won't let me run any formulas with dIFS in them, because of the graphics card.
« Last Edit: October 15, 2013, 07:29:38 PM by Stonevoice » Logged
cKleinhuis
Administrator
Fractal Senior
*******
Posts: 7044


formerly known as 'Trifox'


WWW
« Reply #36 on: October 15, 2013, 07:38:44 PM »

that is an really old computer sad
but for your difs problem i can help you smiley
you cannot combine difs with "normal" functions, you find compiler messages in the main window below the tab area,
you can just combine difs formulas with other difs functions wink mb3d is in no way using a gpu!
Logged

---

divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
Stonevoice
Forums Freshman
**
Posts: 12



« Reply #37 on: October 15, 2013, 07:54:03 PM »

Thanks, cKleinhuas, but I cannot run dIFS  the 'right' way either -in other words, just dIFS combined with dIFS. The formula box does not even show the 'dIFS' headings at among the formula suggestions. The list ends with the 'Ads' column.
If I try to run someone esles params that use dIFS, I get an error message saying that the processor does not have the right instruction set to run those formulas.
I also have a laptop that is about as old, and it CAN run dIFS - I guess it has different CPU or GPU in it.
oh well, getting a new computer in a week with i7 3.5 mHz with 8 GB RAM, so things will change. Azn

I hope I can run MB3D on 64 bit system...
Logged
cKleinhuis
Administrator
Fractal Senior
*******
Posts: 7044


formerly known as 'Trifox'


WWW
« Reply #38 on: October 15, 2013, 08:16:57 PM »

it will work perfectly on that wink
the cpu might be really missing some features that darkbeam hacked into those formulas @darkbeam, no offence you are doing a fantastic job!
Logged

---

divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
DarkBeam
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2512


Fragments of the fractal -like the tip of it


« Reply #39 on: October 18, 2013, 04:54:55 PM »

 cheesy Not really - I just use a few of the oldest CPU features. Just floating point routines... And some xor/and/jg that were also in z80 machines I think grin
Logged

No sweat, guardian of wisdom!
fractalgee
Forums Newbie
*
Posts: 7


« Reply #40 on: July 23, 2015, 04:48:40 PM »

Dual quad core Xeon Mac Pro @2.33GHz

14.5 seconds including ambient shadows calc
Logged
xahhax
Forums Newbie
*
Posts: 7


« Reply #41 on: January 23, 2016, 01:19:28 PM »

2015 iMac 5K Skylake: 0:09.1
Logged
AtomicNixon
Forums Newbie
*
Posts: 7


« Reply #42 on: November 28, 2017, 04:03:28 AM »

Threadripper 1950x at 4.1 Ghz.  Two point eight seconds.  cheesy  I win! 
Logged
hobold
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 573


« Reply #43 on: November 28, 2017, 01:31:06 PM »

Threadripper 1950x at 4.1 Ghz.  Two point eight seconds.  cheesy  I win! 
The name "AMD Ryzen Threadripper" is pretty much the only downside of that monster smiley. Even the price looks good if you compare to Intel - especially if you want to use ECC RAM to help with system stability for those week long renders (support for ECC RAM requires even more expensive Xeons on the Intel side of the fence). Performance is very competitive for anything but AVX code, and even there AMD ain't bad.

(Disclaimer: I am now officially an AMD fanboy, since I built a personal supercomputer based on threadripper. Not overclocking, though; I went for reliability and low noise on air cooling.)

Competition is a good thing. Nice to have it back.
Logged
AtomicNixon
Forums Newbie
*
Posts: 7


« Reply #44 on: December 10, 2017, 09:44:52 PM »

The name "AMD Ryzen Threadripper" is pretty much the only downside of that monster smiley. Even the price looks good if you compare to Intel - especially if you want to use ECC RAM to help with system stability for those week long renders (support for ECC RAM requires even more expensive Xeons on the Intel side of the fence). Performance is very competitive for anything but AVX code, and even there AMD ain't bad.

(Disclaimer: I am now officially an AMD fanboy, since I built a personal supercomputer based on threadripper. Not overclocking, though; I went for reliability and low noise on air cooling.)

Competition is a good thing. Nice to have it back.

Thanks!  And congrats on the new machine!  If you want to use all of it, go for the Enermax full block cover cooler.  I'm using the 360mm model and can add my voice to others in testifying that it's the single best cooler on the market by a wide margin.  Full coverage on the package counts for about 10 degrees C which makes sense given that the dies are situated in the corners.  Most coolers are still trying to cover a square with a circle, not good.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Which processor? Help & Support bib 12 1139 Last post July 10, 2009, 08:32:26 PM
by cKleinhuis
bignum benchmark? Programming « 1 2 » cbuchner1 18 4836 Last post November 03, 2014, 12:17:52 PM
by cbuchner1
Fractal processor Resemblance Sergio CT 0 302 Last post May 16, 2014, 08:33:45 AM
by Sergio CT
squaring benchmark Complex Numbers claude 13 335 Last post April 11, 2016, 09:43:51 AM
by Kalles Fraktaler
mandibular 1GB mesh rendered in 4 seconds, graphics processor raycast guide. 3D Fractal Generation monstercolorfun 0 192 Last post November 25, 2017, 11:17:18 AM
by monstercolorfun

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.166 seconds with 28 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.014s, 2q)