Logo by AGUS - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Did you know ? you can use LaTex inside Postings on fractalforums.com!
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. November 19, 2018, 07:39:45 PM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: A processor benchmark for Mandelbulb 3d  (Read 11273 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
ant123
Guest
« on: February 24, 2011, 01:10:48 PM »

How fast does your computer render this parameter by Theli-at? (render times are displayed at the bottom right corner)
 
  RESULTS:
==================

Celeron M 1.6 ghz
3 minute and 32 seconds

Opteron 154  2.8Ghz (blob)
2 minute and 23 seconds blob, that is slower than a $25 processor from ebay!, but it is a Kool computer.

AMD x2 2.2Ghz (socratease)
2 minute and 10 seconds

1 minute and 49 seconds
Wine on Macbook pro 2.4 C2D (socratease)

Core2Duo 2.0Ghz (ant123)
1 minute and 18.8 seconds

MacBook Pro (2.53 GHz Intel Core i5) under Parallels (KRAFTWERK)
49.2 seconds

Intel Core 2 CPU E8400 @ 3.00 GHz
48 seconds (cytotox)

Intel Core 2 duo @ 3.24 Ghz (E6750)
47 seconds (ant123)

i3 M 350 @ 2.27 GHz (Kameelian)
46.3 seconds

Intel i7-860, Quad Duo Core, 2,8gHz (skyzyk)
38.6 seconds

Phenom 9850 Quad-Core 2.5ghz (Don Whitaker)
38 seconds

Core2Quad 2.4GHz (oppenheimer)
35.8 seconds

Core2Quad Q6600 @2,4GHz (ziegfrid)
34.6 seconds


Core2Quad 2.33GHz (buddhi)
32.3 seconds

AMD Phenom II 965...3.4gh (haltenny)
26.6 seconds

I7 740-QM  @ 1.73GHz (4 Core, 8 Threads, Turboboost: 2.93 Ghz)
25.7 seconds under Linux Wine (ker2x)

i5 750 2.66Ghz (madman)
23.6 seconds

dual quad Xeon 2.0 Ghz, Win-7/64-bit (mrcharles)
22.5 seconds

i7 920 @2.66 Ghz
19.5 seconds (dainbramage)
19.3 seconds (bib)

Phenom X6 3.3ghz (expectation)
18.5 seconds

i7 930 @2.80GHz - Dell XPS (mario837)
17.6 seconds

Intel Xeon X5482 3.2GHz (dual quad cores) 16 GB DDR2 800MHz Vista SP1 64-bit (Nahee_Enterprises)
10.2 seconds

i7 2600k 3.4 GHz [OCd to 4.4 GHz] (4 core/2threads per core), Win7 64-bit (Kameelian)
9.1 seconds

____________________________________
____________________________________
For Mandelbulb3d the computer uses just the CPU and 200-500MB of ram, the gpu is not used, so what matters is the speed of the CPU and the memory, say 1600 memory would be faster than 1333, but you might be able to do larger image renders with more memory.

TEST:
Mandelbulb3Dv16{
M....Uy....u1...S..........2EgavjzHxzqTwzWd7NKzDEEew.GOx.yHJ6BWNLlfaz4ERsIdeBNsD
................................F3j3MMa5nz1........Y./..................y.2.....
.................M.//....6E12...50....EA.....kGlBkqI2ppD/.EvZBcD...E./...w1.BnAH
zEEnAnQD..../2EnAnAnAnAvz0............................................sD...../..
.w1...sDR/dGxbdzTz1fA18BD4gkzeQHfDJaEhyjK90p0REcazH5vZXFiwzrzWhgpmFezzxDWLWLku/.
Uzvzhznth/puzu1BwtvIu8wj......Yx1.....................sD..kz0...................
.............................UJRb4.upRO.sNrd/UkRb4.arRO.cUrd/U9Sb4..............
..........................UX.o2.......0...UD....5/...w2...EG....6/...Mn5...UJI12
XkGf.08cU0AcU0eQ.06Us.Ak.16.2cE.zzzz.MxuvBTuCfuDiUNAT2kYcz1EJzHmWnv4.HEBI.klLS4.
3yhMkskYszfIaQHInDNyzGWfzHx6d2yD2I13.wqN51.e/0biMaOyzcisP8OPAXzD.ezYfTLkRzH.0c..
zzzz.................................2U.8.kzzzD.................................
/6U0.wzzz1...................................QbG6/.cU08.zzFUf74.U08c.szDpZNR..8c
U0EzTFagv0.cU08.QsrRwS4.U08c..bTWmbc..8cU0.lyZLQL/.cU08.Mwbfpe5.U08c.kqTDKLY..8c
U0.kz3fhb0.cU08....cU08.zz/cU08.yz1cU08.xz3cU08..U5QmY1CtM1Oic4Qb/kLWZrLi3KPZB5Q
E....E....E..........6....EGiFLNbJaQU.pPrJaQ.........................c..........
...................3./........zj................................................
................................................................................
.....................2.....3....1....w3Jm3aPnlKMoJ4.............................
.....MU/4MU/4.................zD................................................
................................................................................
................................/....E/...k.....T7pPo34RZ/kHXF5.H/..............
..........U/4M..4MU/4MU/..........................cF.1.......O3E........kz1.....
................................................................................
...........................................2....1....6.....JmZqMj7bP............
.....................................................1........zD................
................................................................................
........................................................}


meanwhile, i found this: http://www.shadoworld.co.uk/UF5/Benchmark/Benchmark%20results.htm
« Last Edit: October 09, 2013, 12:42:28 AM by Nahee_Enterprises » Logged
Oppenheimer_
Forums Freshman
**
Posts: 13


« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2011, 01:27:09 PM »

35,8 seconds

Core2Quad Q6600 @2,4GHz, 6gig ram
Logged
David Makin
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2286



Makin' Magic Fractals
WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2011, 03:11:49 PM »

Related, 2 benchmarks UPRs for Ultra Fractal with extensive results:

http://www.shadoworld.co.uk/UF5/Benchmark/Benchmark%20results.htm

I don't think relative results in Mandelbulb 3D or Mandelbulber will deviate very much from the above, the benchmarks we're actually short of are ones for using GPU rendering - one set for float and hopefully (sometime soon) another set for double smiley
Logged

The meaning and purpose of life is to give life purpose and meaning.

http://www.fractalgallery.co.uk/
"Makin' Magic Music" on Jango
lenord
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 611


No Matter where you go there you are


« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2011, 04:04:59 PM »

Renders it fast enough, what the hell difference does it make. What ever Puter you have is the one you have to use and it's only going to be as fast as it is, this is not a true Benchmark test.
Logged
ant123
Guest
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2011, 04:24:02 PM »

Len, i took 2 hours and a half rendering a 2mp image last night. I want a faster PC for ASIO/3d/etc. it also gives a comparison across cpu architectures, X4, X6, i7, C2Q, etc.

http://www.shadoworld.co.uk/UF5/Benchmark/Benchmark%20results.htm

I don't think relative results in Mandelbulb 3D or Mandelbulber will deviate very much from the above

Thanks, i looked on google for "fractal/sciencemark/pi benchmarks" and i couldnt find a single one! The UF5 comparison is definately the page i was after!

Logged
blob
Strange Attractor
***
Posts: 272



« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2011, 05:19:04 PM »

2mn 23s on my AMD Opteron 154 (single core 2.8Ghz socket 939 CPU).

 grin
Logged
tomot
Iterator
*
Posts: 179


WWW
« Reply #6 on: February 24, 2011, 05:26:06 PM »

32.3 sec

quad core cpu q6600 @ 2.4ghz
physX GPU acceleration enabled
4 gb ram

Logged
Madman
Fractal Molossus
**
Posts: 678



« Reply #7 on: February 24, 2011, 07:29:48 PM »

For what it's worth: 23.6 seconds on an i5 750
Logged

All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power (Ashleigh Brilliant)
Buddhi
Fractal Iambus
***
Posts: 895



WWW
« Reply #8 on: February 24, 2011, 09:30:36 PM »

32.8 sec

Intel Core 2 Quad 8200 (2.33GHz)
under Linux - Wine
Logged

tomot
Iterator
*
Posts: 179


WWW
« Reply #9 on: February 24, 2011, 09:34:55 PM »

For what it's worth: 23.6 seconds on an i5 750

thanks for the info. but that's not particularly speedier either.  shocked I think I'll wait an 8 core cpu before investing in a new machine.
Logged
bib
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2070


At the borders...


100008697663777 @bib993
WWW
« Reply #10 on: February 24, 2011, 10:44:25 PM »

i7 920 @2.66 Ghz => 19.3
Logged

Between order and disorder reigns a delicious moment. (Paul ValÚry)
DarkBeam
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2512


Fragments of the fractal -like the tip of it


« Reply #11 on: February 24, 2011, 10:46:22 PM »

A note. Parameters are shared for learning purposes, not for benchmarking. Have respect for the artists use them fairly smiley
Logged

No sweat, guardian of wisdom!
Madman
Fractal Molossus
**
Posts: 678



« Reply #12 on: February 24, 2011, 11:20:12 PM »

You're tempting me Darkbeam... I agree on the second part about respect, but in my opinion, there's no rule that says that parameters posted may only be used for a certain purpose. But maybe we should discuss that somewhere in a separate topic...
Logged

All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power (Ashleigh Brilliant)
David Makin
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2286



Makin' Magic Fractals
WWW
« Reply #13 on: February 24, 2011, 11:28:18 PM »

A note. Parameters are shared for learning purposes, not for benchmarking. Have respect for the artists use them fairly smiley


That doesn't apply to the UF parameters at the link I posted, those were especially designed to cover a large range of variation in actual processing, in particular the second test UPR requires a lot more heavy math in the form of transcendental functions, divides etc.
Logged

The meaning and purpose of life is to give life purpose and meaning.

http://www.fractalgallery.co.uk/
"Makin' Magic Music" on Jango
Sockratease
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 3181



« Reply #14 on: February 25, 2011, 12:17:59 AM »

This is an odd file for benchmarking because it doesn't take all that long to render.  When there was a Carrara Benchmark file floating around for a similar unofficial and informal test, it involved many features that were quite time consuming.  The idea was to turn off and on various features in the slowest of the performers, and see what in the program can be blamed.

Anyway - here's what I got  (I turned on Hard Shadows to make it more interesting, but broke down the times accordingly) :

Running under WINE on my MAC  (Macbook Pro - 2.4 GHz Intel Core Duo) :

Main Render; 1 Minute, 14 Seconds
Ambient Shadows; About 3 Seconds
Hard Shadows; 32 Seconds

Total : About 1 Minute 49 Seconds


On my Web Crap Computer  (AMD Athlon 64 Dual Core 4200 @ 2.2 GHz)  (Yes, I have a 64 Bit Processor running a 32 Bit Operating System)  (It was used, and cheap, and it came like that - I plan to upgrade in a decade or 2)  (No graphics card, just the on board chip) :

Main Render; 1 Minute, 31 Seconds
Ambient Shadows; About 3 Seconds
Hard Shadows; 36 Seconds

Total : About 2 Minutes 10 Seconds


On my Offline Computer Computer  (Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @2.4GHz, 2.39 GHz) EDIT - Oh yeah, NVidia GeForce 8800 GTS) :

Main Render; 48 Seconds
Ambient Shadows; About 2 Seconds
Hard Shadows; 13 Seconds

Total : About 1 Minute 3 Seconds
« Last Edit: February 25, 2011, 12:36:53 AM by Sockratease » Logged

Life is complex - It has real and imaginary components.

The All New Fractal Forums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Which processor? Help & Support bib 12 1181 Last post July 10, 2009, 08:32:26 PM
by cKleinhuis
bignum benchmark? Programming « 1 2 » cbuchner1 18 5238 Last post November 03, 2014, 12:17:52 PM
by cbuchner1
Fractal processor Resemblance Sergio CT 0 427 Last post May 16, 2014, 08:33:45 AM
by Sergio CT
squaring benchmark Complex Numbers claude 13 526 Last post April 11, 2016, 09:43:51 AM
by Kalles Fraktaler
mandibular 1GB mesh rendered in 4 seconds, graphics processor raycast guide. 3D Fractal Generation monstercolorfun 0 677 Last post November 25, 2017, 11:17:18 AM
by monstercolorfun

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 5.169 seconds with 28 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.012s, 2q)