Logo by jwm-art - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Check out the originating "3d Mandelbulb" thread here
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. April 25, 2024, 05:20:22 PM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: Some questions about cardoids, circles and the area  (Read 2489 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Mircode
Alien
***
Posts: 37


« on: November 23, 2013, 12:37:24 AM »

Hi there!

Recently I was digging a little deeper into the Mandelbrot science and some questions came up. I think they are related so I don't open a new thread for each of them.

1) It is often stated that the circles are not perfect except for the big one. Is that somehow proven or obvious? I have never encountered a noticeably deformed circle. I suspect that this might just be an impression when seeing the distorted minibrots at the elephant valley.

2) Same thing with the cardoids. There was a very nice overlay of the main cardoid with one inside the elephant valley. I can't find the post anymore, but they looked identical, just the circles around were distributed with a little shift so the whole thing looked bent, although the basic shapes retained their shape.

3) I know that the circles and the cardoids are positioned at the roots of the iterated sequence. Is there any easy way to tell whether a root is the center of a circle or of a cardoid?

4) Is it possible to compute the radius of circles (or if they are not circles, the area) around such a root? Is it possible for cardoids? Also to compute their orientation?

If the whole thing just consisted out of perfect circles and cardoids and we knew their sizes, the area should be computable not just by pixel counting...

Logged
Mircode
Alien
***
Posts: 37


« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2013, 02:08:25 PM »

This may be interesting, didn't have time to study it yet.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mandelbrot_set_Components.jpg
Logged
lkmitch
Fractal Lover
**
Posts: 238



« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2013, 04:43:41 PM »

1) One way to see that is to look analytically at the components' boundaries.  When you do that, the main cardioid boundary falls out for fixed-point iterations, and the circular disc centered at -1/0 for period-two oscillation.  When you look at the same analysis for period-three, you don't get the equation for a circle.  Alternatively, you can place a circular disc mask inside the disc and see that the boundary doesn't quite match.

2) In a quick study I did, it seemed like the cardioids themselves were not distorted, but rather, the arrangement of discs around them.  This was done with images (rather than analysis), so I don't have any proof of that.

3) There probably is a way to distinguish cardioid centers from disc centers, but I don't know what it is.

4) There is a proxy for a circle radius that I've used before, it's the distance from the root to the tangent point between the disc and the cardioid.  For the main cardioid, Mandelbrot worked out an approximate model of disc size.  I looked at that and found that the errors between the model and the actual Mandelbrot set appear to be fractally distributed.
Logged
Adam Majewski
Fractal Lover
**
Posts: 221


WWW
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2013, 09:29:49 PM »

method of distinguish cardioids from pseudocircles is described in : Universal Mandelbrot Set by A. Dolotin
Logged
claude
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 563



WWW
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2013, 04:13:04 PM »

4) Is it possible to compute the radius of circles (or if they are not circles, the area) around such a root? Is it possible for cardoids? Also to compute their orientation?

There's some notes on size/orientation estimates here:

http://www.ibiblio.org/e-notes/MSet/Windows.htm
http://www.ibiblio.org/e-notes/MSet/Scaling.htm

I implemented it in Haskell:

Code:
-- size-estimate.hs
import Data.Complex (Complex((:+)), polar)
import System.Environment (getArgs)

lambdabeta :: Int -> Complex Double -> (Complex Double, Complex Double)
lambdabeta period c = (lambda, beta)
  where
    zs = take period . iterate (\z -> z * z + c) $ 0
    lambdas = drop 1 . map (2 *) $ zs
    lambda = product lambdas
    beta = sum . map recip . scanl (*) 1 $ lambdas

sizeorient :: Int -> Complex Double -> (Double, Double)
sizeorient period c = polar . recip $ beta * lambda * lambda
  where
    (lambda, beta) = lambdabeta period c

main :: IO ()
main = do
  [p, x, y] <- getArgs
  let period = read p
      re     = read x
      im     = read y
      (size, orient) = sizeorient period (re :+ im)
  putStrLn $ "period = " ++ show period
  putStrLn $ "re     = " ++ show re
  putStrLn $ "im     = " ++ show im
  putStrLn $ "size   = " ++ show size
  putStrLn $ "orient = " ++ show orient

Example:

Code:
$ ./size-estimate 4 -0.15652016683 1.0322471089
period = 4
re     = -0.15652016683
im     = 1.0322471089
size   = 8.482858703709158e-3
orient = -0.6171988505484176

You need to know the period and nucleus of the atom you're trying to describe.
Logged
claude
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 563



WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2013, 06:06:34 PM »

3) I know that the circles and the cardoids are positioned at the roots of the iterated sequence. Is there any easy way to tell whether a root is the center of a circle or of a cardoid?

As Adam suggested, there's a book and paper, I used this version: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0701234

The relevant part is section 5, in particular equation 5.8.  In the paper \gamma is defined implicitly in equation 5.1, and it took me quite some time to figure out that it's the same as \frac{\partial}{\partial z} f(z, c).  Equation 5.8 then becomes:

<br />\epsilon = - \frac{1}{ \frac{\partial}{\partial c}F \frac{\partial}{\partial z}F} \left(\frac{\frac{\partial}{\partial c}\frac{\partial}{\partial c}F}{2 \frac{\partial}{\partial c}F} + \frac{\frac{\partial}{\partial c}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}F}{\frac{\partial}{\partial z}F}\right)<br />

When \epsilon is near 0 then you have a cardioid, when \epsilon is near 1 then you have a circle.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2013, 06:08:16 PM by claude, Reason: fix typo » Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Circles of Color Fractal Art fractalwizz 3 2093 Last post April 06, 2008, 01:54:52 PM
by cKleinhuis
Are the Mandelbrot Cardoids in fact loose form each other? Philosophy kek 3 6818 Last post February 21, 2011, 11:01:28 PM
by David Makin
circles and circles 2 Mandelbulb3D Gallery ericr 0 1365 Last post February 27, 2013, 08:47:08 PM
by ericr
Circles in the sand Images Showcase (Rate My Fractal) thom 2 1792 Last post March 02, 2013, 04:11:46 PM
by thom
Not Your Usual Circles Fractal eXtreme Gallery « 1 2 3 » simon.snake 42 3742 Last post December 15, 2014, 08:43:39 PM
by Gregoryno6

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.219 seconds with 27 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.015s, 2q)