|
taurus
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: January 10, 2013, 12:30:04 PM » |
|
i like the seeker, but would like to ommit "holy" ....  no problem - it was just a suggestion. variations like - seeker of the grail 2013 or
- seeker of the fractal grail 2013
sound also appealing to me |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
when life offers you a lemon, get yourself some salt and tequila!
|
|
|
|
cKleinhuis
|
|
« Reply #31 on: January 10, 2013, 12:47:04 PM » |
|
"seeker of the fractal grail 2013" is sounding good in my eyes ... erh ears  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
---
divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1
|
|
« Reply #32 on: January 10, 2013, 02:47:01 PM » |
|
and the finder of the fractal grail 2013 is auto-awarded the Nobel prize?
what if two grails are found? "my grail is grailier than yours!"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
M Benesi
|
|
« Reply #33 on: January 10, 2013, 10:01:16 PM » |
|
My pseudo grailic double M formulas are the most grailic 3d z^2 ever in existence. It's from last year though, and despite being the most awesome attempt at the grail ever, largely unused.
Grailic.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Kali
|
|
« Reply #34 on: January 10, 2013, 10:41:51 PM » |
|
It seems like someone is a bit dissapointed for not being within the poll candidates  You did a great job, and deserve to be there, but... Don't take this too seriously  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 10, 2013, 10:44:11 PM by Kali »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
taurus
|
|
« Reply #35 on: January 10, 2013, 11:35:42 PM » |
|
see it like a cycle race - not the one with the highest speed wins, the one with the best endurance will make it. my suggestion for the title is the seeker not the closest approacher... by the way. imho the fractal grail is as non existent as the holy grail... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
when life offers you a lemon, get yourself some salt and tequila!
|
|
|
|
Kali
|
|
« Reply #36 on: January 11, 2013, 12:24:56 AM » |
|
see it like a cycle race - not the one with the highest speed wins, the one with the best endurance will make it. my suggestion for the title is the seeker not the closest approacher... by the way. imho the fractal grail is as non existent as the holy grail... Existent or not, there are people still seeking for it. Some believe it's hidden in my country, Argentina. Check out this "foundation": http://www.delphos.com.ar/content/stu_001.htmhttp://www.delphos.com.ar/content/stu_002.htmI hope to not get as crazy as them looking for the fractal one  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 11, 2013, 12:27:37 AM by Kali »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tglad
Fractal Molossus
Posts: 703
|
|
« Reply #37 on: January 11, 2013, 12:27:29 AM » |
|
Since a 3d Mandelbrot cannot exist (there are no Clifford algebras which are conformal in more than 2d) I don't see why people focus on this 'grail'.
Only a few people here are still attempting to find that particular fractal.
Time for a different quest?? My vote- the quest for the real 3d Von Koch surface
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 11, 2013, 12:43:08 AM by Tglad »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
cKleinhuis
|
|
« Reply #38 on: January 11, 2013, 03:11:51 AM » |
|
the reason why i exagerate always about the search is the irony that lies in it, we know that something does not exist, but since it is the ideal, basically what hamilton was searching for, which is what i call the wholy grail, the non whipped cream 3d mandelbrot ... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
---
divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
|
|
|
|
cKleinhuis
|
|
« Reply #39 on: January 11, 2013, 03:13:34 AM » |
|
@kali lol, i had such a big laugh  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
---
divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
|
|
|
|
Alef
|
|
« Reply #40 on: January 11, 2013, 09:48:56 AM » |
|
Since a 3d Mandelbrot cannot exist (there are no Clifford algebras which are conformal in more than 2d) I don't see why people focus on this 'grail'.
Only a few people here are still attempting to find that particular fractal.
Becouse there should be some glorious target for inspiration. Something to seek, like what is behind horizont. Time for a different quest?? My vote- the quest for the real 3d Von Koch surface
Yes, but then it must be formuled more visionary. Maybe 3D barnsley fern? |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 11, 2013, 10:06:42 AM by Alef »
|
Logged
|
fractal catalisator
|
|
|
|
taurus
|
|
« Reply #41 on: January 11, 2013, 09:58:14 AM » |
|
Since a 3d Mandelbrot cannot exist ... I don't see why people focus on this 'grail'.
Fractals are still often seen more as religious misbelief, than serious math. The seach of the grail is just a funny way, to flirt with that stereotype. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
when life offers you a lemon, get yourself some salt and tequila!
|
|
|
|
M Benesi
|
|
« Reply #42 on: January 12, 2013, 05:12:50 AM » |
|
It seems like someone is a bit dissapointed for not being within the poll candidates ... Don't take this too seriously My life is over. In all seriousness, it's not about the poll, it's about the lack of usage and/or knowledge of the greatest 3d M-type formula. It's not an ego thing- it's a fact thing. The method is leagues ahead of other 3d M-type z^2 attempts- especially given the lack of whipped cream, which would be bad if there were strippers and blow involved. However, in this case the lack of whipped cream is good. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Alef
|
|
« Reply #43 on: January 12, 2013, 05:43:48 PM » |
|
Fractal community is a bitt of non-egalitarien, yes.
I was thinking of, if there is no good 3D number system or conformal squaring, 3D fractals IMHO should be mostly based on vector math. Vector algebra have special features and operations, and perfectly fitts in 3D space. Actualy it alredy is so, but it could be much expanded. Throught even wikipedia have not much vector algebra transformations.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
fractal catalisator
|
|
|
|
eiffie
Guest
|
|
« Reply #44 on: January 12, 2013, 05:44:43 PM » |
|
Benesi your posts today are hilarious. Thanks for the laughs.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
May 15, 2011, 04:10:28 AM
Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM