Logo by AGUS - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Visit us on facebook
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. April 20, 2024, 08:37:07 AM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: Non-trig expansion for RuckerBrot?  (Read 950 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
DarkBeam
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2512


Fragments of the fractal -like the tip of it


« on: March 16, 2011, 12:40:48 PM »

Hi, I would like to ask to the geniuses of this wonderful forum: is there a non-trig expansion of the Rucker's MB3D?

Find the formula here:

http://www.fractalforums.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=2081.0;attach=1031;image

The entire topic

http://www.fractalforums.com/theory/summary-of-3d-mandelbrot-set-formulas/

This is A Rucker PDF file with interesting explanations. http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/notebooks/rucker_mandelbulb_ver7_sept24_2009.pdf

Page 8 shows the non-trig expansion of White/Nylander formula (I hoped that was his formula!... sad )

newx = ( x*x + y*y - z*z )*( x*x - y*y) / ( x*x + y*y )
newy = 2 * ( x*x + y*y - z*z )*x*y / ( x*x + y*y )
newz = - 2 * z * sqrt( x*x + y*y )


Thanks!
Logged

No sweat, guardian of wisdom!
DarkBeam
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2512


Fragments of the fractal -like the tip of it


« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2011, 01:41:42 PM »

Hm. huh?
Obtained this from WolframAlpha (x,y,z are real numbers so complex parts can be safely skipped), but still confused...

cos(2 atan2(y,x) ) = +(y*y-x*x)/(y*y+x*x)
sin(2 atan2(y,x) ) = -(4 y*z)/(y*y+x*x)

then:

cos(2 atan(z/x) ) = (x*x-z*z)/(z*z+x*x)
sin(2 atan(z/x) ) = +(4 x*z)/(z*z+x*x)

The strange thing is he says "atan(z/x)" and not 2*atan...

cos(atan(z/x) ) = abs(x)/sqrt(z*z+x*x)
sin(atan(z/x) ) = z/sqrt(z*z+x*x) * x/abs(x)


What is correct? shocked
« Last Edit: March 16, 2011, 01:47:26 PM by DarkBeam » Logged

No sweat, guardian of wisdom!
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
A new? Simple way to compute DE for any trig. Mandelbulb Theory « 1 2 3 » mrrgu 38 14965 Last post January 12, 2010, 01:37:25 AM
by fractalrebel

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.276 seconds with 24 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.006s, 2q)