Logo by Pauldelbrot - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Did you know ? you can use LaTex inside Postings on fractalforums.com!
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. March 19, 2024, 05:24:38 AM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: Are all "particles/quarks/universe" fractals of "Extended Periodic Table(s)"?  (Read 1674 times)
Description: PROTON UNIVERSE.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
sunshaker
Forums Newbie
*
Posts: 3



WWW
« on: January 14, 2016, 03:53:14 PM »

Are all "particles/quarks/universe" fractals of "periodic table"? TOP QUARKS 173 GeV, W BOSON 80 GeV, Z boson 92 GeV, Higgs 125/126 GeV.

A few years back I tried extending the periodic table using "electron sequences", This opened up a new way for me to view the "Elements", I cannot now help but see protons/quarks/particles has "Fractals" of "extended periodic table(s).
http://alpha-omega-sunshaker.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/top-quark-condensate.html

These tables also allowed me a different understanding of the 16% matter, to 84% dark matter/supersymmetric particles.
Matter / Dark Matter / Supersymmetric particles
As I believe it is the joining of two tables/top quarks that give us matter/dark matter (universe),

There may be 172 possible elements, of these 92 occur naturally (where we are in universe expansion),
92+80=172 W+Z=172
When I add up all the protons in the naturally occurring elements I get 4232, then if I add up anti protons/positrons shown in red below I get 25444,
This gives me a ratio of 16%matter to 84% dark matter/supersymmetric particles. Dark matter is estimated to constitute 84.5% of the total matter in the Universe,   
Left corner shows 92 naturally occurring elements, coloured to each chemical group.




PROTON, with different Quark masses within.


Elements are all part of a Fractal Quark system(Proton), If all the elements exist within Proton, then the Universe also exists within the Proton.

It is still a work in progress, I came to this forum by accident, looking for a better way to show these tables has fractals,

outer proton quark masses 173 GEV


The new 750 Gev bump(750 protons within system), from cern, at higher energy runs,


CASIMIR EFFECT WITHIN PROTON between shells/layers.

 
Logged

2 8 8 18 18 32 32 18 18 8 8 2
lycium
Fractal Supremo
*****
Posts: 1158



WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2016, 09:06:26 PM »

I think your numerology might need updating, since there are some newly discovered elements: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/four-new-elements-complete-seventh-row-periodic-table

It's funny how Fractal Forums consistently attracts this kind of, uhhhm... shall we call it "non-standard thinking"  afro
Logged

sunshaker
Forums Newbie
*
Posts: 3



WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2016, 10:06:56 PM »

I think your numerology might need updating, since there are some newly discovered elements: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/four-new-elements-complete-seventh-row-periodic-table

It's funny how Fractal Forums consistently attracts this kind of, uhhhm... shall we call it "non-standard thinking"  afro
Why would my "numerology" need updating? My tables already shows these four elements Z113, Z115, Z117, & Z118, with their correct electron sequences, My tables go to Z172 http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tOtpzG1WlM8/VPoBgnaWE0I/AAAAAAAACWo/JCJW91r5LpQ/s1600/92%2Bnatural%2Belements.png
Perhaps it is "non-standard thinking",  rightly or wrongly, I now see everything has "fractals of the elements",, So YES, I came to a "Fractal forum", More just to look and read what was new in fractals, and whether there was any other ideas on fractal patterns within matter, protons, neutrons, quarks, gluons etc.  


« Last Edit: January 18, 2016, 02:14:00 PM by sunshaker » Logged

2 8 8 18 18 32 32 18 18 8 8 2
cKleinhuis
Administrator
Fractal Senior
*******
Posts: 7044


formerly known as 'Trifox'


WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2016, 10:11:51 PM »

i have not really understood what you where to tell, but i like it extraordinarly to attract "non standard thinking" people wink

i am still eagerly convinced that fractal worldview is something everybody should be aware of, and there is more to it than just "fractal antennas" (mobile phones) and "fractal surface analysis" (smoothnes analysis, cancer detection)

just because we have not found anything reasonable (like prediction stock market developments ) there is no point in stopping to play around with what we have got here, and at least the fractals fulfill a very beautiful and relaxing state of mind ... which might lead to new ideas and insights of completely different kinds

my five €'s wink
Logged

---

divide and conquer - iterate and rule - chaos is No random!
M Benesi
Fractal Schemer
****
Posts: 1075



WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2016, 10:28:02 PM »

Why would my "numerology" need updating?...
Perhaps it is "non-standard thinking",  rightly or wrongly, I now see everything has "fractals of the elements",, So YES, I came to a "Fractal forum", More just to look and read what was new in fractals, and whether there was any other ideas on fractal patterns within matter, protons, neutrons, quarks, gluons etc.  
<Quoted Image Removed>

  Don't worry about those who are curmudgeonly towards those who show up to promote a vague idea.  There might be some value in your idea, but...

  If you're not intentionally being a parody of internet crackpots, you've got to do the work (maybe 1000s of hours of work) to figure out a way of presenting your idea in such a way that others can easily test it.  

  If you smoosh a bunch of ideas together, you'll get a new idea (combine fractals, quark energies, atomic numbers and see what you get).  You're going to see lots of that on the internet... and you're not going to see a lot of people putting in the effort to prove their ideas or even make their ideas testable.

  They just produce more and more information (and a lot of it is just bullshit or half formed ideas/guesses) to go through without ever doing the hard work of creating a simple test for their hypothesis.  


  I don't see an easy explanation of a way to test your idea anywhere, and your website resembles crackpot websites I've seen in the past (in that it has links to lots of crackpot sites...).  

  I'd suggest reading some stuff from the following excellent website to get a basic idea of how to understand the difference between science and useless (but probably entertaining to some people) bullshit:

https://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pscindx.htm


« Last Edit: January 15, 2016, 10:34:54 PM by M Benesi » Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.158 seconds with 24 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.006s, 2q)