Newtonian Triples

[jehovajah]

The relation of this topic to vortex mathematics  or rather ring theoretical structure of the Z₉ and Z₁₈ and the Z₂ + Z₉ finite cyclic groups is the fascinating topic of study I am embarking on now.

Here Randy Powell gives some insight


<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/uROabhExdwY&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/uROabhExdwY&rel=1&fs=1&hd=1</a>

[jehovajah]

So I actually was working on these 2 years ago!

This link discusses the quaternions and the search for a triplex combination

http://www.songho.ca/math/quaternion/quaternion.html

The author sets out to demonstrate by contradiction that a triple form does not exist for the premise he starts with.

2 things: contradiction is not a proof of none existence! And the base elements  chosen are not the only possible basis.

When I tackled this issue it was from a different point of view. I was looking at group behaviours modulo (n), and specifically applying that to the rotation of the axes of a reference frame. I could see what I was doing, but I could not explain what I was doing!

I remember being very poorly at the time, recovering from a life threatening blood disorder. Working on this issue was a welcome distraction.

Applying the roots of unity in this way as a control for the axes interchange seemed an interesting thing to do, but I honestly had no clue what I was doing and moved from one inspirational flash to another.

Today I have the benefit of the mentorship of Hermann Grassmann and that has made a huge difference in terms of my ability to coherently understand what I was doing back then. It is making a huge difference going forward also.

[Alef]

Have no idea whats there is going on, but nice anyway.

I remember bing very poorly at the time, recovering from a life threatening blood disorder. Working on this issue was a welcome distraction.

Fractals aren't so bad way to escape.