Title: Another 3D stereo flame (cross-eyed view) Post by: doncasteel8587 on June 06, 2007, 02:45:38 AM I like the lacyness of this flame
(https://fractrace.dev.java.net/files/documents/6137/58990/Render_1181005356317.jpg) Title: Re: Another 3D stereo flame (cross-eyed view) Post by: Nahee_Enterprises on June 06, 2007, 02:00:09 PM I like seeing the images you create with a white background over the black background. For me, it makes it easier to see some of the details better. :)
Title: Re: Another 3D stereo flame (cross-eyed view) Post by: doncasteel8587 on June 07, 2007, 01:24:03 AM I'm tending to like the white backgrounds more myself.
So far the white background seems to give the flames a more solid smokey feel, where a black background gives them more of a glowing plasma feel. I've done a couple with different background colors as well. Obviously I'm just begining to learn what works when, I think a lot depends on the palette and the shape and feel of the flame itself, one flame may work really nicely with a colorful palette on a black background, where the next flame will only look good with a more subdued palette against a light background. Of course in a couple of months I may totally disagree with what I just said :P Title: Re: Another 3D stereo flame (cross-eyed view) Post by: Nahee_Enterprises on June 07, 2007, 04:10:40 PM So far the white background seems to give the flames a more solid smokey feel, where a black background gives them more of a glowing plasma feel. Yes, I agree. A good explanation of how the dark and light backgrounds affect a flame image. ....I think a lot depends on the palette and the shape and feel of the flame itself, one flame may work really nicely with a colorful palette on a black background, where the next flame will only look good with a more subdued palette against a light background. I think the palette will most likely effect the choice of background over the shape/feel of the flame. But for my own preferences, I tend to enjoy viewing them on a white background. :) |