Title: More handsome reciprocal formula Post by: Jesse on February 12, 2011, 10:06:06 PM Following a suggestion from DarkBeam i modified the reciprocal formula a bit to limit artifacts.
The results are changing with bigger limits, but are still unique enough to use it instead. Here is a pic with limiter = 0.6, took only about 3 minutes with stepwidth limiter of 1: (reciprocalX2 + sierpinski) (http://nocache-nocookies.digitalgott.com/gallery/5/1127_12_02_11_9_45_29.jpeg) Title: Re: More handsome reciprocal formula Post by: 0Encrypted0 on February 12, 2011, 11:04:51 PM Would a reciprocalY or reciprocalZ be possible?
If so, would they be useful? Title: Re: More handsome reciprocal formula Post by: DarkBeam on February 12, 2011, 11:31:35 PM If Jesse don't write reciprocal y z i'll do by myself. It is a menace :lol:
Title: Re: More handsome reciprocal formula Post by: Jesse on February 12, 2011, 11:38:25 PM Only if you write a reciprocal R too, just my menace :dink:
Title: Re: More handsome reciprocal formula Post by: DarkBeam on February 13, 2011, 11:10:17 AM Only if you write a reciprocal R too, just my menace :dink: Sphereinv is a reciprocal r. :D Already done :banana: Title: Re: More handsome reciprocal formula Post by: DarkBeam on February 13, 2011, 11:41:34 AM From sphereinv description;
x', y', z' => Translate + scaling (by radius) of x, y, z with given params. Then, defined Rho = (x'*x'+y'*y'+z'*z'), <- = R x'' = x'/Rho y'' = y'/Rho z'' = z'/Rho :dink: Title: Re: More handsome reciprocal formula Post by: Jesse on February 13, 2011, 01:19:03 PM uhm, youre absolutely right... dividing by the sqr.
But a little tip should be ok, because dividing is much slower than multiplication: compute the reciprocal of Rho and multiplicate 3 times, fld1, fdivrp to do the reciprocal value. Just in case you had not done so, i didnt looked at the source. Keep up your good work! :) Title: Re: More handsome reciprocal formula Post by: DarkBeam on February 13, 2011, 01:35:31 PM uhm, youre absolutely right... dividing by the sqr. But a little tip should be ok, because dividing is much slower than multiplication: compute the reciprocal of Rho and multiplicate 3 times, fld1, fdivrp to do the reciprocal value. Just in case you had not done so, i didnt looked at the source. Keep up your good work! :) But in the end you have to divide in every case :hmh: ... Where is the optimization? Another question You divide by y+epsilon. But I meant; compare y by epsilon if y<epsilon, cutoff. ;) Title: Re: More handsome reciprocal formula Post by: Jesse on February 13, 2011, 09:35:26 PM But in the end you have to divide in every case :hmh: ... Where is the optimization? Instead of: x'' = x'/Rho y'' = y'/Rho z'' = z'/Rho You do: Rho = 1 / Rho //or include it in the step before x'' = x'*Rho y'' = y'*Rho z'' = z'*Rho So you have only 1 division instead of 3. Quote Another question You divide by y+epsilon. But I meant; compare y by epsilon if y<epsilon, cutoff. ;) I know, that is a bit different version. Did not tried your version, dunno what might be better. Just do it like you want and we have more options. :) Forgot: in my formula there is a little bug, if you use negative limiter values: i used 'or' for the sign function and not 'xor', but that affects not very much. And it makes no difference on positive values, so it is not urgent to change it. Just if you want to copy it... Title: Re: More handsome reciprocal formula Post by: DarkBeam on February 13, 2011, 11:04:11 PM I need your help for coding my first formula ... A 4d extension of Barnsley but too bad don't work. :) tomorrow I will send
Title: Re: More handsome reciprocal formula Post by: Jesse on February 14, 2011, 06:26:10 PM Would a reciprocalY or reciprocalZ be possible? If so, would they be useful? Here they are, gives new nice possibilities in combination with the sierpinski for example! Title: Re: More handsome reciprocal formula Post by: bib on February 14, 2011, 06:59:04 PM Would a reciprocalY or reciprocalZ be possible? If so, would they be useful? Here they are, gives new nice possibilities in combination with the sierpinski for example! The limiter instantly gives me animation ideas :) Thanks Jesse! Title: Re: More handsome reciprocal formula Post by: Madman on February 14, 2011, 07:33:06 PM Ohw yeah very nice! The possibilities got infiniter once again :dink: |