Title: Iterated Lehmer means Post by: BradC on September 03, 2010, 09:40:22 AM I was playing around with variants of the arithmetic-geometric mean (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic-geometric_mean), and I ran into some fractals, described below. I'm not sure if they're new or not.
Given numbers w, x, ..., z, their Lehmer mean is defined as This definition only makes sense as a kind of "mean" if the arguments are positive, but let's allow complex arguments... Given n numbers a, b, ..., d, define sequences ak, bk, ..., dk by When these n sequences all converge to the same limit (which always seems to happen), call this limit L*: The function L* so defined appears to be meromorphic, with fractal structure. Consider the simple case Here's a contour plot over the complex plane of the log of the absolute value of f2: (http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/2945/sym2arg.png) Numerically, the ringed lighter-colored circles appear to be simple poles. So, this function f2 has a single large pole at -1, with two "smaller subpoles", each of which have two "smaller subpoles" of their own, and so on, approaching a Cantor set. Not sure what happens right at the limit points. The function appears to have no zeros. Here's a plot of (http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/5204/sym3arg.png) Here are f4, f5, and a zoom of f5: (http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/2949/sym45arg.png) Here's one where the fixed arguments are asymmetrically arranged: (http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/6558/asym4arg.png) Some analysis: The Lehmer means are rational (quotient of two polynomials) functions of their arguments. Therefore any finite composition of them will also be a rational function. The poles appear wherever a denominator becomes zero at some iteration. (Very large values cause Lehmer means to become very large.) In the f2(z) = L*(1,z) case above, the degree of the denominators approximately doubles at every iteration, so twice as many poles are added at each step. For this reason, the bifurcating fractal structure of the poles is maybe not surprising. The poles appear at algebraic points because the denominators are polynomials and the fixed argument (1) is algebraic. Here the locations of the first few poles of f2 are labeled: (http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/3212/sym2alg.png) Here's an oblique view of |f2(z)|: (http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/5269/sym2obl.png) I've looked numerically at the power series for f2, but haven't been able to recognize the coefficients. The coefficients are rational if you expand at z = 1. The numerical residues of the poles appear to be algebraic multiples of f2(0). I've also numerically looked for a differential equation that f2 satisfies, but haven't found anything simple... Title: Re: Iterated Lehmer means Post by: kram1032 on September 03, 2010, 11:37:37 AM Nice stuff :D
Title: Re: Iterated Lehmer means Post by: Tglad on October 16, 2010, 02:21:24 AM Just noticed this post. It looks really interesting... a cluster, but if you draw a line from each node to the next it looks like it would be a tree... maybe.
Title: Re: Iterated Lehmer means Post by: jehovajah on February 10, 2011, 04:02:01 AM Thanks Brad, I was looking for an intro into sequences and series, especially where they come from geometrically/ spaciometrically.
Some of the contour maps remind me of pitting due to high energy cosmic rays entering protective materials. Another image in my mind is that of the "Badlands" in North America, both outcomes created by high energy motion. Title: Re: Iterated Lehmer means Post by: DarkBeam on February 10, 2011, 12:01:50 PM ;D Very good ideas :dink: |