Title: Stacking Cubic Mandelbrots for Mandelbulbs Post by: Rudy on April 12, 2010, 10:23:17 PM Something I've mentioned before is that if we look at generalized cubics of the form z = z^3 + k z + c (eliminating the z^2 term by moving the origin), we get a collection of Julia sets Jkc for these maps. And the cubic mandebrots Mk are the set of all c such that Jkc is connected.
I recently implemented these guys in Ultra Fractal, see my public formula and parameter files rvr.ufm and rvr.upr. Also see my blog post http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2010/04/02/the-rudy-set-fractal/ (http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2010/04/02/the-rudy-set-fractal/). My belief is that we could make a nice 3D Mandelbulb-style shape by stacking up a sequence of the Mk. To suggest what I'm getting at, here's a YouTube video that scans forward and back through some of the Mk. [I updated the video on April 16, 2010]. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytCIGUS4DKI I don't see too much evidence of the dreaded taffy or whipped cream; if we could find a way to stack up a few hundred of the Mk and render as a 3D object, we'd have something nice. One thing I'm noticing is that in many spots you're seeing an overlay of two patterns...this is because the Mk points are determined by the non-escape of TWO different critical points. I am unsure if there would be a distance-estimator formula for this. For those interested, here is the Ultra Fractal code for the general Cubic Mandelbrot Mk. Code: GeneralCubicMandelbrot {Title: Re: Stacking Cubic Mandelbrots for Mandelbulbs Post by: David Makin on April 12, 2010, 11:49:53 PM Hi Rudy - I think for the distance estimator you'd have to calculate the running derivative for both values of k and use the one that bails out to get the DE value.
Title: Re: Stacking Cubic Mandelbrots for Mandelbulbs Post by: KRAFTWERK on April 13, 2010, 04:40:23 PM This is exiting... O0
Title: Re: Stacking Cubic Mandelbrots for Mandelbulbs Post by: Rudy on April 13, 2010, 06:27:48 PM I got a cautionary email from fractalist Daniel White: "Judging from the video alone, I'm afraid that the Z axis (time component here of course) is flooded with whipped taffy ;) The way I know is because the shape smoothly changes as time goes by. Too smoothly. For anything even starting to resemble the Mandalisk (aka real 3D Mandelbrot), in a time representation, we'd see bubbles forming and then evaporating the next moment, with tiny bubbles 'twinkling' like thousands of tiny crystals, and larger bubbles/circles taking a while longer to appear and disappear. Everything would foam up in an 'unmistakable' way. I can render your shape, but it would look similar to a million other versions from what I can tell." I take Dan's point---if you look at one of those little warts along the rim of the Mk in the video, the wart stays pretty much the same as time goes by, which means that it's tracing out an ugh, taffy-strand ridge. But I still have some hopes of an interesting 3D stack. If you focus on the splitting, warping bulb on the top in the video, it seems like things are indeed appearing and disappearing there, which suggests that, when stacked, they might make respectably bulbous bulbs...or at least something of interest. And look at this new video, which does seem to have a lot of twinkling going on. That could be a broccoli field along the bottom... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyJFA8_8J0g |