Title: attempt on triplex numbers over exponential form Post by: kram1032 on December 09, 2009, 10:21:48 PM Here is the idea:
complex numbers have this exponential form: where 1 is the positive unit 1-vector (which is trivial of course :) ) quaternions have this form: where and a,b,c are forming a unit 3-vector. or so, here's the idea on how to do extensions: basically, take a unit 2-vector, that is, cos(angle) and sin(angle) (as sin²x+cos²x=1) this way, I propose the exponential notation to be: or note that this also is consistent with how spherical coordinates might be defined :) (spherical to cartesian -> this would allow for relatively simple power rules (at *least* for integer powers) power n: and this is where I am right now. This, if developed further, is one of two things: - either it's the best representation for triplex numbers, I personally could think of, or it's just an other way to produce boring Mandelbrot-rotations-around-real-axis.... (or actually, maybe it's both) either way, this could be interesting.... can anyone out there help me further on this? :) for example, if I did it right, then it's kind of clear now how Title: Re: attempt on triplex numbers over exponential form Post by: kram1032 on December 10, 2009, 01:42:16 AM I think I need to understand powers of quaternions better.
Particularily how the a,b,c values change seperately from the angle alpha in exponential form... else I wont get to the actual Mandelbulb formula to be derived from this idea. For now, and I guess that would be wrong, this would be the iteration formula, obviously being way too simple.. r -> r^n phi -> n*phi theta -> theta though, was this actually tried yet? I doubt the result would be tooooo interesting but I'd like to see it anyway... Title: Re: attempt on triplex numbers over exponential form Post by: bugman on December 10, 2009, 06:55:41 PM I posted an exponential triplex formula here: http://www.fractalforums.com/theory/triplex-algebra/msg9554/#msg9554 |