Title: Sierpinski triangle Post by: Buddhi on November 22, 2009, 09:28:43 PM Few days ago I found on Internet some pictures of Sierpinski Triangle and Sierpinski Temple (David Makin's pictures). It is very beautiful mathematical form. Unfortunately I didn't find any detailed algorithm. I decided to found proper algorithm by myself. I made lots of trials and before I understood how this kind of iterative algorithms works I get some interesting pictures. One of these is below.
(http://www.fractalforums.com/gallery/1/thumb_640_22_11_09_9_00_02.jpg) http://www.fractalforums.com/gallery/?sa=view;id=1088 Finally I found proper algorithm and rendered this "Sierpinski's Planet" (http://www.fractalforums.com/gallery/1/640_22_11_09_9_01_17.jpg) http://www.fractalforums.com/gallery/1/640_22_11_09_9_01_17.jpg Bellow is my iteration algorithm in C Code: double k=2.0; Title: Re: Sierpinski triangle Post by: Dinkydau on November 25, 2009, 02:57:05 PM The second one is really cool!
Title: Re: Sierpinski triangle Post by: Timeroot on February 04, 2010, 07:11:37 AM It took me a while to realize these were square pyramids, not the regular sierpinksi pyramids. This means that, although there does seem to be a "floor" in this picture, the "floor" is dense, and it could extend onwards who-knows-how-far... a very simple, yet awe-inspiring image. Reminds me of the ancient Aztecs. ;D
Title: Re: Sierpinski triangle Post by: kram1032 on February 04, 2010, 11:44:44 AM due to them being cubes, you could actually build them... I wonder how stable they would be :)
(Not using any glue between the cubes) Title: Re: Sierpinski triangle Post by: Timeroot on February 04, 2010, 05:30:23 PM Yes, but you would have to build it upside down - note that many of the edges of the "floors" aren't supported by anything. By inverting it, we could get a buildable structure.... but it would tip over pretty easily. Would make an interesting problem for civil engineers, that's for sure!!!! |