Logo by Trifox - Contribute your own Logo!

END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

it was a great time but no longer maintainable by c.Kleinhuis contact him for any data retrieval,
thanks and see you perhaps in 10 years again

this forum will stay online for reference
News: Visit the official fractalforums.com Youtube Channel
 
Home Help Search Gallery Downloads Login Register
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. October 02, 2018, 06:24:34 AM


Login with username, password and session length


The All New FractalForums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!


Welcome to Fractal Forums > Fractal Art > Images Showcase (Rate My Fractal) > To Image Edit, or Not to ImageEdit?
Pages: [1]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
Share this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on Twitter
Author Topic: To Image Edit, or Not to ImageEdit?  (Read 1228 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Sockratease
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 3181
« on: December 27, 2006, 01:37:40 AM »
I tried my hand at image editing this nice Plantscape Julia from Chaoscope:



Bigger: http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m278/sockratease/fronds2.png



I got this:




Bigger: http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m278/sockratease/fronds2b.png


I don't know...

It was fun, though!
Logged
Life is complex - It has real and imaginary components.

The All New Fractal Forums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!
Zoom
Guest
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2006, 03:25:50 AM »
I like the second image, though I must remain careful not to call it an improvement.

Editing images can sometimes bring out more than the original, but it is a skill to know when to edit and when not to.
Logged
matera
Guest
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2006, 03:00:15 AM »
I think it gives it more of an illusion of depth. It's always fun to play around, anyway...
Logged
ericbigas
Guest
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2006, 09:18:12 AM »
Luke:  "Is the dark side stronger?"
Yoda:  "No, no, no. Quicker, easier, more seductive."

I have to admit that I like your processed version better, Sock, but there's something cooler about fractal images which are unedited.  I want to see the complex plane with documentary-like accuracy.  I want the shapes to be the result of graphing a function, not Photoshop filtering.  All other things being equal, fractal art > fractal-based art.

Keep it real.
Logged
Nahee_Enterprises
World Renowned
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 2250


use email to contact


nahee_enterprises Nahee.Enterprises NaheeEnterprise
WWW
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2006, 11:03:07 AM »
Quote from: Sockratease on December 27, 2006, 01:37:40 AM
    I tried my hand at image editing this nice Plantscape Julia from Chaoscope:
            http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m278/sockratease/fronds2.png
    I got this:
            http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m278/sockratease/fronds2b.png
    I don't know...
    It was fun, though! http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m278/sockratease/fractl.gif

When it comes to editing a fractal image with a graphic application (or using a program that both renders fractals and allows altering them like UltraFractal can do), then it becomes a question as to what you are trying to accomplish with the finished product.

Though I do not alter generated fractals very often, there are times when I feel something else is needed to get the full effect of what I want to see.   It is always a judgment call, and sometimes after playing with the image I end up going with the original fractal.

But I tend to use drop-shadows a lot when I display 3-D fractals.    wink

Anyway, both of your images were good.    cheesy
 
« Last Edit: October 14, 2013, 08:01:40 AM by Nahee_Enterprises » Logged
_Sincerely,  Paul  N. Lee_ _ _ educated _ _ _ _ _ _
http://www.Nahee.com/PNL/Fractals.html
http://www.Nahee.com/Fractals/
Sockratease
Global Moderator
Fractal Senior
******
Posts: 3181
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2006, 01:35:26 PM »
I agree about intent.

But... I enjoy "both sides" of The Force!

The purity of a well rendered formula is spectacular, yet the ability of fractals to enhance other pieces of art is unsurpassed!

Just keep it Honest, never trying to pass image editing off as a pure fractal, and you'll be Keeping it Real.

In my, somewhat less than humble, opinion...
Logged
Life is complex - It has real and imaginary components.

The All New Fractal Forums is now in Public Beta Testing! Visit FractalForums.org and check it out!
lycium
Fractal Supremo
*****
Posts: 1158



WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 01, 2007, 12:14:00 AM »
Quote from: ericbigas on December 31, 2006, 09:18:12 AM
Luke:  "Is the dark side stronger?"
Yoda:  "No, no, no. Quicker, easier, more seductive."

I have to admit that I like your processed version better, Sock, but there's something cooler about fractal images which are unedited.

i totally 100% agree with this, one does not grow stronger through the use of crutches! very appropriate quote wink
« Last Edit: January 01, 2007, 03:43:26 PM by lycium » Logged
http://chaoticafractals.com | http://indigorenderer.com | http://lyc.deviantart.com
Pages: [1]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
IMAGE ART 2 Fractal Art AGUS 0 893 Last post April 30, 2008, 01:27:37 AM
by AGUS
ART IMAGE 3 Fractal Art AGUS 0 1166 Last post April 30, 2008, 02:22:04 AM
by AGUS
On and On (edit) Mandelbulb3D Gallery dainbramage 0 454 Last post March 06, 2011, 04:06:26 AM
by dainbramage
2-D FractInt image looks like 3-D image FractInt Gallery simon.snake 8 754 Last post March 13, 2012, 12:47:57 AM
by David Makin
box of quaternions-edit Images Showcase (Rate My Fractal) alij 7 421 Last post September 22, 2013, 08:21:56 AM
by Nahee_Enterprises

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.3 seconds with 27 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.027s, 2q)