Logo by Trifox
News: Fractalforums.com Spring Fractal Art Contest 2008 - And The Winners are: - View Results
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. November 23, 2008, 04:30:25 PM


Login with username, password and session length



Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: The Old Post-Processing Fractal Art Discussion  (Read 317 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Nahee_Enterprises
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 536



View Profile WWW
« on: July 03, 2007, 10:16:19 PM »

Greetings,


Over the past few days, there have been some interesting conversations on the "Orbit Trap" blog <http://orbittrap.blogspot.com/>, with such topics as:

     Take It to the Limitations -- Terry Wright (July 01, 2007)

     The Myth of the Post-Processing Bias -- Damien Jones  (June 28, 2007)

     A Dream of Post Post-Processing -- Terry Wright (June 26, 2007)

     Why I don't use Ultra Fractal -- Tim Hodkinson  (June 23, 2007)

Whether one agrees or disagrees has been an issue amongst those creating fractal images for many years now.

Logged

Sincerely,
P.N.L.
-------------------------------------------------
http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/PNL_Fractals.html
http://www.Nahee.com/Fractals/
doncasteel8587
Fractal Lover
**
Posts: 183



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2007, 11:43:18 PM »

Maybe the best proof yet, that Fractals are Art...

Every person, whether they like fractals or not, can appreciate any single fractal over another according to their own personal likes and dislikes.
   
   ...... sounds like Art to me Grin
Logged

lycium
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 515



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2007, 06:11:12 AM »

pretty cool blog Smiley i had to refute them on the "all fractal artists post-process and that no one fractal tool is proprietary" point though.

some good points are raised, and an interesting mix of styles and opinions are represented.
Logged

lycium
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 515



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: July 09, 2007, 12:45:09 AM »

a lot of mud slinging going on there... too many of the members are really touchy :/

"In the FAQ section of the calendars Fractal Forum, the editors state they try to produce a calendar that is representative of the current state of our art. Heres the link. Now I ask you. Is this statement an accurate description of the final product? Or would a more honest tag line be: a compilation of mostly fractal spiral forms made mainly using Ultra Fractal?"
Logged

lycium
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 515



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2007, 08:17:00 AM »

the blog has just gone nuclear :|

i don't see how they can have such a negative opinion of you; of course i'm lacking context but you've been nothing but helpful on this forum.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2007, 08:38:37 AM by lycium » Logged

Nahee_Enterprises
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 536



View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2007, 12:50:12 AM »

a lot of mud slinging going on there...  too many of the members are really touchy  :/

When it comes to any two people getting together to discuss the topics of "fractals" and "art", then there usually will be a lot of controversy.  It was never this bad about ten years ago.  But with the advent of a specific group of individuals (let's call them the "Fractali") they have done their best to control the market and ideas of what "fractal art" is.

"In the FAQ section of the calendars Fractal Forum, the editors state they try to produce a calendar that is representative of the current state of our art.  Heres the link.  Now I ask you.  Is this statement an accurate description of the final product?  Or would a more honest tag line be:  a compilation of mostly fractal spiral forms made mainly using Ultra Fractal?"

Very astute observation !!   Grin

Something many of us have been saying since the beginning of that particular Calendar.  They say it is "open" for anybody to submit images and participate in.  But look through the history of images and those that get represented in the Calendar.    Wink


BTW -- would not the singular version of "Fractali" probably be "Fractalus" ??   Wink   Grin    Tongue

« Last Edit: July 16, 2007, 12:52:09 AM by Nahee_Enterprises » Logged

Sincerely,
P.N.L.
-------------------------------------------------
http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/PNL_Fractals.html
http://www.Nahee.com/Fractals/
Nahee_Enterprises
Fractal Bachius
*
Posts: 536



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2007, 12:57:23 AM »

the blog has just gone nuclear :|
i don't see how they can have such a negative opinion of you; of course i'm lacking context but you've been nothing but helpful on this forum.

People to tend to react that way out of fear over things they do not understand, or because they feel threatened by a superior knowledge.    Wink   Cheesy    Grin 

They also hate it when somebody comes along and shows the world what the truth really is, especially when the others are attempting to create their own "special" version of the facts and history.     Tongue


Logged

Sincerely,
P.N.L.
-------------------------------------------------
http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/PNL_Fractals.html
http://www.Nahee.com/Fractals/
Pages: [1]
  Print  

 
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
How to post images (i.e. LINK them don't ATTACH them) Images Showcase (Rate My Fractal) heneganj 12 260 Last post December 08, 2006, 10:54:57 AM
by heneganj
Fractal Applications (post from Iman Tavassoly) Fluid Dynamics, Turbulence & Weather Prediction heneganj 0 237 Last post October 23, 2006, 09:47:32 AM
by heneganj
first post Images Showcase (Rate My Fractal) spanzhang 2 212 Last post October 27, 2006, 04:00:27 AM
by Matera the Mad
High Dynamic Range Processing ? Programming Trifox 9 244 Last post February 12, 2007, 07:00:45 PM
by lycium
new thread per post Discuss Fractal Forums lycium 7 2426 Last post June 05, 2007, 04:50:15 PM
by Nahee_Enterprises

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 3.752 seconds with 27 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.131s, 2q)