END OF AN ERA, FRACTALFORUMS.COM IS CONTINUED ON FRACTALFORUMS.ORG

Cool!

The similarity with Abox-based pseudo-kleinan in Mandelbulb3D is striking.

Gave it a quick try, going through the different Types with various settings.  Did notice that there does not seem to be much of a change when using either the "Rain" or "Spectrum" color schemes, they appear to be quite similar.

This is an interesting beginning of your online application, and will be awaiting further enhancement announcements.     
 

Very interesting, thanks for the links!

IFS is a generic name for "iterated function system". Indra pearls are different. They live on the Poincare disc (non-compact space), not on the sphere that is compact. Etc. etc. One may say: all fractals are similar. And yet there are many different families of fractals with different properties. The devil is in the details.
For instance, according to a recent paper by Andrew Vince et al. on Mobius IFS, the last fractal ("para") in the Generator has no rights to exist. Vince proved (with Barnsley) that parabolic transformations can not generate fractals. And yet we have something that looks like a fractal and walks like a fractal. It is no yet clear if it quacks like a fractal. Vince himself was puzzled when saw this fractal


Those on the sphere are partially stretched. They are not made of contractions.


It is not that simple. The distribution (measure) on the sphere represents a density matrix (mixed state), not a wave function. Moreover, because of linearity of quantum mechanics many different distributions represent the same mixed state. So, according to the orthodox interpretations of quantum theory these fractal measures will not be observable. Yet there are also non-orthodox interpretations (you have to get rid of the orthodox interpretation of the Heisenberg's uncertainty relations first) that suggest that these fractal shapes can leave experimental traces. So there may be some new adventure ahead...

P.S. And indeed, there are fractals made of Mobius transformations living in higher dimensions. Especially nice are those in 4 dimensions, since in 4D we have beautiful Platonic solids (24 cell and 600 cell). They will be added to the generator (3D slices) in due time.

Yes, most fractals are either infinite in their size or live on the Poincare disc, but both can be easily transformed onto a sphere conformally. Circles remain as circles.
Anyway, its an interesting slant, from a physics angle, I'll have to have a go with the 'para' fractal.

You might be interested in the Kleinian spheres section of this page: http://www.aleph.se/andart/archives/2005/11/

A few more Kleinian fractals here: http://www.josleys.com/show_gallery.php?galid=346  3d but not on a sphere surface.

Any conformal fractal on the 2d plane converts to a Reimann sphere using the normal formula. So a conformal fractal on the poincare disk can go straight onto a sphere, but it'll have a big gap from magnitude 1 to infinity, which you can close just by enlarging the disk... or apply other mobius transforms if you wish.

The quantum take on it is interesting, I wish I had time to read more about it.

Straying off topic, but you might also like these which I made, they bear some resemblance also, to your fractals: https://sites.google.com/site/tomloweprojects/scale-symmetry/mobius-maps

Any image (including Indra's pearls) which exists on a disk can be mapped conformally to a sphere surface. The disk is on a plane, and each point is identified by the polar coordinates (distance, angle), the equivalent sphere is given in spherical coordinates where longitude = angle and latitude = 2*atan(distance) - 90. You can scale the disk on the plane by any amount prior to converting to a sphere, so the 'hole' at the sphere head can be as small as you like. The image on the sphere is then conformal, infinitesimal shapes are preserved.